Background Facts

Dr. Bradford Mullin is a board-certified neurosurgeon and a fellow of the American College of Surgeons. He has been practicing spinal surgery for years.

When Dr. Mullin saw a patient named Cedric Wheeler, who had presented at the emergency room with serious bladder control problems, Dr. Mullin diagnosed the problem as modified cauda equina syndrome. Dr. Mullin recommended urgent surgical intervention and performed the surgery himself.

Dr. Mullin later concluded that Wheeler’s cauda equina syndrome resulted from nursing negligence in a surgery that had taken place a few weeks earlier at Townsen Memorial Hospital. He provided an expert report to that effect in connection with Wheeler’s suit against the hospital and one of the nurses.

The hospital and the nurse argued that Dr. Mullin is not qualified to express that opinion. They also found fault with virtually every aspect of Dr. Mullin’s opinion, whether relating to standard of care, breach, or causation. The trial court disagreed and denied the hospital and nurse’s motion to dismiss. The defendants appealed.

The Law

The trial court may dismiss the lawsuit if the claimant’s expert report is untimely or deficient. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 74.351(b). The court may grant a motion that challenges a report’s adequacy, but only if it appears to the court, after hearing, that the report does not represent an objective good faith effort to comply with the definition of an expert report in Subsection (r)(6). TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 74.351(l).

An expert report is a good faith effort if it (1) informs the defendant of the specific conduct called into question and (2) provides a basis for the trial court to conclude the claims have merit. Because a claimant must file an expert report
early in the litigation at a threshold stage of the case, courts measure the adequacy of the report using a lenient standard. To be a good faith effort, the report must not contain a material deficiency, and a report meets this standard if it includes all the required elements, and explains their connection to the defendant’s conduct in a nonconclusory fashion. Although magic words are not required, bare conclusions are not sufficient.

The purpose of the expert report requirement is to weed out frivolous malpractice claims in the early stages of litigation, not to dispose of potentially meritorious claims. The report need not marshal all the plaintiff’s proof to avoid dismissal.

A trial court’s decision to deny a motion to dismiss based on the adequacy of an expert report is reviewed for an abuse of discretion and only the information contained within the four corners of the report is considered.

Texas Appellate Court Opinion

The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas stated in its March 24, 2026 Memorandum Opinion: “A physician’s medical degree alone does not qualify him to opine on the standard of care applicable to nurses. Pankaj, 695 S.W.3d at 920. But a physician may qualify as an expert on this standard if he “shows he is familiar with the standard of care for nurses as to the care or treatment of the medical condition in question, including through the supervision or training of nurses in this context” … Based on Dr. Mullin’s amended report, the trial court reasonably could have determined that his supervision of and collaboration with nurses during postoperative care made him qualified to render an expert opinion on the standard of care for nurses and health care providers … We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding Dr. Mullin was qualified to render an opinion on the standard of care as to Townsen and Baloney.”

Source Townsend Memorial Hospital v. Wheeler, NO. 01-24-00369-CV.

If you or a family member suffered serious injury or other harm that may be due to medical malpractice in Texas or in another U.S. state, you should promptly find a Texas medical malpractice attorney, or a medical malpractice attorney in your state, who may investigate your medical malpractice claim for you and represent you or your family member in a medical malpractice case, if appropriate.

Visit our website or call us toll-free in the United States at 800-295-3959 to find medical negligence lawyers in your state who may assist you.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

Summary
Texas Appellate Court Holds Neurosurgeon Qualified To Testify As To Nursing Standard Of Care
Article Name
Texas Appellate Court Holds Neurosurgeon Qualified To Testify As To Nursing Standard Of Care
Description
Dr. Bradford Mullin is a board-certified neurosurgeon and a fellow of the American College of Surgeons. He has been practicing spinal...
Author
Publisher Name
Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Publisher Logo