Florida Appellate Court Overturns $2.5M Wrongful Birth Verdict

162017_132140396847214_292624_nOn January 8, 2014, in a split decision, the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Fourth District overturned a $2.5 million verdict in a wrongful birth case. A wrongful birth claim is a medical malpractice claim in which the parents give birth to an impaired or deformed child and allege that negligent treatment or advice deprived them of the opportunity to avoid conception or terminate the pregnancy. Causation can be shown if the plaintiff can prove that she would have obtained an abortion if the doctor had not been negligent.

The purpose of a wrongful birth claim is to recover damages for the extraordinary expense of caring for the impaired or deformed child, over and above routine rearing expenses. Not all states allow wrongful birth claims: for example, Maryland does not.

In the Florida case, the mother gave birth to a baby with no hands, only one leg, and a fraction of a foot attached to the hip on the other leg. The parents alleged in their medical malpractice claim that an initial ultrasound fell below the standard of care and was reported inaccurately, which had a negative effect on future ultrasounds, including a higher-level ultrasound that was also reported incorrectly. The mother testified that she would have undergone an abortion had she known of the birth defects.

The medical malpractice defendants alleged on appeal that the mother did not prove causation because she could not have legally had an abortion in Florida at the time of the higher-level ultrasound because by then the mother was one day into her third trimester of her pregnancy (Florida law prohibits an abortion during the third trimester “unless two physicians certify in writing to the fact that, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, the termination of pregnancy is necessary to save the life or preserve the health of the pregnant woman; or the physician certifies in writing to the medical necessity for legitimate emergency medical procedures for termination of pregnancy in the third trimester, and another physician is not available for consultation.” § 390.0111(1), Fla. Stat. (2008))

Florida law defines the third trimester as the weeks of pregnancy after the 24th week of pregnancy. If the mother was in her third trimester based on the gestational age of the fetus at the time of the higher-level ultrasound, the appellate court held that she could not have had an abortion in Florida, which would mean that there was no causation and therefore the parents could not recover for wrongful birth.

The defendants contended that the weeks of pregnancy is calculated by using the gestational age of the fetus (the gestational age calculation uses the date of the mother’s last menstrual period, not the point of conception, to measure the fetus’s development through the trimester stages). The plaintiffs contended that the mother had not yet entered her third trimester at the time of the higher-level ultrasound, using the date of conception method of calculating weeks of pregnancy.

The Florida appellate court held, “While evidence of the availability of abortions in other states and the possibility that the mother might have been able to obtain a third trimester abortion in Florida or elsewhere may also be relevant to a jury on the issue of causation, those considerations do not constitute valid reasons for excluding evidence that third trimester abortions are generally illegal in Florida. In light of the trial court’s failure to permit the jury to consider the relevance of section 390.0111 to the plaintiffs’ specific situation, leading to the exclusion of other relevant evidence on that factual issue, a new trial on the issue of liability and causation is required.”

The dissent to the majority opinion stated, in part: “I disagree with the majority’s interpretation of the term “pregnancy” under section 390.011(8), Florida Statutes (2008). The majority holds that the weeks of pregnancy under the statute must be measured by the fetus’s gestational age, which begins with the mother’s last menstrual period. However, section 390.011(8) refers to weeks of “pregnancy,” and does not mention the fetus’s gestational age. Because the term “pregnancy” is undefined in the statute, the term is to be given its plain and ordinary meaning, which can be ascertained by reference to a dictionary … ”

“Under the plain meaning of the term, a woman cannot be “pregnant” without a developing embryo, fetus, or unborn offspring within her body. A woman is not “pregnant,” and therefore “pregnancy” has not begun, at the time of her last menstrual period. Accordingly, the dictionary definition of “pregnancy” indicates that a pregnancy begins, at the earliest, at conception … even if measuring the weeks of pregnancy in section 390.011(8) by the fetus’s gestational age is a reasonable interpretation of the statute, the rule of lenity still dictates that we interpret the statute in favor of permitting an abortion until the 24th week of pregnancy as measured from the point of conception … ”

“Therefore, although there was evidence that the mother’s fetus had a gestational age of about twenty-four weeks at the time of the June 30th ultrasound, section 390.0111 would not have precluded her from obtaining an abortion in Florida at that time had she been properly notified of the fetus’s defects … Furthermore, even if the mother was past the deadline for obtaining a legal abortion under Florida law, the mother could have obtained an abortion outside the state of Florida.”


If you or a loved one may have been injured as a result of medical negligence in Florida or in another state in the U.S., you should promptly seek the legal advice of a Florida medical malpractice attorney or a medical malpractice attorney in your state who may investigate your malpractice claim for you and represent you in a malpractice case, if appropriate.

Click here to visit our website or call us toll-free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may assist you with your malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on FacebookTwitterGoogle+, and LinkedIn as well!

This entry was posted on Friday, January 10th, 2014 at 4:22 am. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


Easy Free Consultation

Fill out the form below for a free consultation or contact us directly at 800.295.3959.
  • Please enter the correct answer to this math problem.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    Easy Free Consultation

    Fill out the form below for a free consultation or contact us directly at 800.295.3959