Blog

Archive for the ‘Wrongful Death’ Category

Colorado Medical Malpractice Verdict For Infected Bedsores Leading To Death

Friday, May 4th, 2012

A Colorado medical malpractice jury returned a verdict in the amount of $3.2 million in favor of the family of an 88-year-old-man in a nursing home who died from infected bedsores, one of which was the size of a baseball, that were allegedly not properly treated. The nursing home that is responsible for the medical malpractice verdict is owned by a large out-of-state corporation that has 4,000 nursing home beds in 8 states, including two other nursing homes in Colorado.

The man had become a resident of the nursing home in May, 2009. He had Parkinson’s disease but was able to walk with assistance to the cafeteria in the nursing home and worked as a janitor in the nursing home before he developed a bedsore in September, 2010. After the bedsore developed, the man’s condition deteriorated to the point where he was unable to walk, even with assistance, and he became unresponsive and stayed in his bed. He also stopped eating and drinking.

Apparently the man’s family was not told about the bedsore. It was not until October, 2010 that a nurse’s aide employed by the nursing home told the man’s son about multiple severe bedsores on his father’s buttocks and scrotum that were infected.

Upon discovering the bedsores and their condition, the son wanted his father immediately transferred to the hospital. At first, the nursing home did not want to transfer the man to the hospital for treatment. Once the man was transported to the hospital, he was found to be dehydrated and malnourished (both conditions can lead to the development of bedsores and both conditions can have a negative impact on attempts to successfully treat bedsores). The man’s death was linked by his doctors to his infected bedsores.

After the man’s death, the Colorado Health Department inspected the nursing home and issued citations against the nursing home for 27 deficiencies.

Source

The development of bedsores in nursing home residents is generally avoidable if proper and timely care is provided to residents. Residents at risk for developing bedsores are often required to be turned and repositioned in their beds at set intervals (often at least every two hours) to help avoid developing bedsores. Pressure relieving devices such as air mattresses for residents’ beds and other devices designed to reduce the pressure points where the body comes in contact with the resident’s bed (such as heals, elbows, buttocks, and the back of the head) are often useful if timely employed.

If bedsores do develop, it is critical that they be diagnosed quickly and promptly and that they be properly treated so that they do not progress to more serious and dangerous stages of development.

If bedsores do develop and cause serious injuries or death to nursing home residents, medical malpractice attorneys often investigate whether there was sufficient staff on all shifts to provide necessary care to the nursing home residents based not only on the number of nursing home residents assigned to each caregiver, but also based on the level of care that each of the assigned residents required from the caregivers. Medical malpractice attorneys also investigate whether the proper care was timely provided to the injured resident.

If appropriate, medical malpractice claims based on the lack of appropriate and timely care owed to nursing home residents may be alleged based on inadequate staffing levels, inadequate training of staff, and/or inadequate care provided by the nursing home’s staff.

If you or a loved one suffered serious injuries or death as a result of nursing home negligence, nursing home neglect, or nursing home abuse, click here to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim and represent you in a medical malpractice case, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Study: Improving Economy Associated With Rise In Nursing Home Deaths

Monday, April 16th, 2012

A recently published research study by a well-respected nonpartisan research group operating under a grant from the Social Security Administration found that during improving economic times when lower-paid nursing home staff seek and obtain better paying jobs elsewhere, there are additional deaths of people over 65 (especially for women over 65) and that overall mortality rates rise with the rising economy. Therefore, there is a basis for concluding that when the economy is expanding, nursing home staff are reduced and become scarce and that deaths among elderly residents in nursing homes rise as a result.

Prior research has shown that death rates in the United States rise during periods of low unemployment and fall as unemployment rates rise. The reason for such is believed to be that health is negatively effected and mortality is thereby increased during periods of economic growth when increasing employment rates may result in increased job-related stress, less time for leisure and physical activities, less attention to a good diet, etc.

The recent study found that for each one percent decrease in the unemployment rate, the mortality rate for men increased by one-quarter of one percent and the mortality rate for women increased by four-tenths of one percent with the increase being the same for women over 65 (women over 65 are typically not employed and therefore job-related causes for the increase in the death rate for women over 65 would not be an explanation for the increase in the death rate for this population).

In nursing homes, the rate is even greater and statistically significant: a 0.56% increase in deaths in nursing homes for every one percent decrease in the unemployment rate. And mortality increases in states with higher percentages of their populations who are in nursing homes.

The deaths of men and women over 65 accounted for seventy five percent of the additional deaths, with women in this age group accounting for fifty five percent of the additional deaths. The study also found that the changes in the death rates for people 65 and older were principally associated with changes in the employment of younger adults. Therefore, the researchers looked into the level of nursing home employment (in which most of the residents are elderly and there are more female residents than male residents since women tend to outlive men) to attempt to find the reason that more of the elderly die as unemployment is falling.

Prior research has shown that the ability of nursing homes to hire lower-paid staff such as nursing aides decreases as the economy improves as these lower-paid employees find higher-paying jobs in other areas of the economy (a one percent decrease in the unemployment rate equates to a three percent percent decrease in nursing home aides and more than two percent decrease in nurses).

Therefore, it appears that the research indicates that a greater scarcity of nursing home aides may have a direct and significant impact on nursing home residents, resulting in nursing home residents dying in greater numbers as the unemployment rate decreases.

Source

The research would support the common-sense requirement that nursing homes must maintain sufficient levels of care-giving staff in order to provide appropriate care to their nursing home residents. When nursing homes choose to reduce their staff or fail to employ sufficient staff for their residents, the residents suffer serious consequences as a direct result of the insufficient staffing levels.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries or death as a result of inadequate nursing home staffing and/or as a result of nursing home neglect, nursing home negligence, or nursing home abuse, you should promptly consult with a medical malpractice attorney to determine if you may have a medical malpractice claim against the nursing home for the inadequate or negligent care.

Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to investigate your possible claim against a nursing home or call us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Pharmacy Error Was The Cause Of Chicago Infant’s Death

Sunday, April 15th, 2012

In 2010, a couple gave birth to a son who was four months premature. The parents stayed by their baby’s bedside for six weeks in the hospital, caring for and nurturing their delicate newborn. On October 15, 2010, the baby had heart surgery but suddenly died from unknown causes.

An investigation into the infant’s sudden and unexpected death determined that a pharmacy technician using an electronic system entered the incorrect information for the baby that resulted in a massive unintended overdose of sodium chloride, resulting in the baby’s death.

This tragic incident may have been avoided had the automated alerts in the IV compounding machine been turned on. The pharmacy error was further complicated by the label on the IV bag stating the incorrect concentration of the solution. The identification of the pharmacy mistake was delayed when a lab technician reading the infant’s blood test results believed that the abnormally high sodium indication was an inaccurate test result.

Upon discovering the pharmacy error and other medical mistakes that contributed to the unfortunate death of the baby, the hospital implemented changes in policies and procedures to avoid future similar pharmacy errors, including activating alerts in the IV compounder machines and further strengthening checks before medications leave the pharmacy.

The hospital has settled the medical malpractice lawsuit that had been brought on behalf of the infant’s parents, in the amount of $8.25 million, which settlement was approved by the court on April 5, 2012.

Source

Medication errors by hospitals and retail pharmacies unfortunately are not uncommon. Many medications have similar sounding names or similar spellings that may result in the wrong medications being filled. The dosages of many medications vary according to what the medical care providers prescribed. A pharmacist or less-trained pharmacy technician may intend to fill a prescription with 0.5 ml of a medication but instead fill the prescription with 5 ml, which may be disastrous for the patient if the mistake is not caught before the medication leaves the pharmacy and is administered to the patient.

The increasing use of electronic devices and computer software in pharmacies to lessen the likelihood of a wrong prescription being filled have reduced pharmacy mistakes but human error continues to be a major source of pharmacy errors. A computer may catch and alert to a pharmacy error in filling a prescription but only if the human inputs the full and correct information into the computer. Mistakes can occur when a pharmacist or pharmacy assistant who is used to filling certain medications at certain dosages puts the “usual” dosing information into the pharmacy computer for a patient whose prescription differs from the typical dosage. Complacency and routine in filling medications may also result in inadvertant pharmacy errors.

The vast majority of pharmacy errors are due to negligence and are unintentional. Nonetheless, the unintended injuries suffered as a result of a medication error are no less serious, permanent, and painful if the error was “simply a mistake.”

If you or a loved one suffered injuries or losses as a result of a medication error, pharmacy mistake, or pharmacy error in filling a prescription, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries and losses. The prompt assistance from a medical malpractice attorney in your local area may help you determine if you have a valid claim for pharmacy negligence.

Click here to visit our website or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you with your medical malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

South Carolina Medical Malpractice Verdict For Death After Surgery

Saturday, April 14th, 2012

On March 9, 2012, after a one-week trial before a South Carolina medical malpractice jury, the surviving husband of a woman who died in November, 2007 just three weeks after surgery, received a medical malpractice verdict in his favor in the amount of $2.4 million. The medical malpractice claim alleged that the woman had gynecological surgery during which her bowel was perforated and the perforation was not treated properly or timely, leading to her death.

The medical malpractice defendants claimed that the risk of bowel perforation during the surgery is a known risk and that the diagnosis and treatment of the woman’s bowel perforation were timely and proper. The medical malpractice jury evidently did not agree with the defendants and found against them.

Source

“Known Risk” Of Treatment Versus Medical Malpractice

One of the most common medical malpractice defenses put forth by medical malpractice defendants is that the “bad outcome” complained of in the medical malpractice claim is a known risk of the treatment that the patient was made aware of and assumed the risk of suffering.

Medical providers are required to obtain “informed consent” from the patient before performing medical procedures, during which the medical provider explains to the patient the proposed medical procedure and all known risks of the procedure and alternatives to the proposed procedure that a reasonable patient would want and expect to know under similar circumstances.

While there is a certain amount of risk associated with all medical treatment, and bad medical outcomes may and do occur without medical negligence being a cause of the bad outcome, it is important to recognize that if substandard medical care was a cause of the bad outcome, then medical malpractice has occurred for which a medical malpractice claim may be made.

As an example of the above, it is a known risk that anyone occupying a motor vehicle being operated on the public roadways is exposed to the risk of becoming involved in a motor vehicle collision. However, if the collision was caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle (such as crossing over the double yellow lines separating traffic moving in opposite directions), then the injured occupants of the non-negligent motor vehicle may bring a negligence claim against the negligent driver.

In the medical malpractice lawsuit filed by the surviving husband in South Carolina, while it may be a known risk that the particular gynecological surgery performed on the man’s wife involved a risk of perforating the bowel during surgery, the cause of the perforation may still be due to medical malpractice (that is, the breach of the standard of care by the surgeon).

The South Carolina medical malpractice jury that heard the testimony and considered the evidence during the trial from both the medical malpractice plaintiff and the medical malpractice defendants determined that the medical malpractice defendants breached the standard of care and that the breach was a proximate cause of the woman’s injuries and death (and her surviving spouse’s losses as a result).

If medical malpractice may have been a cause of your injuries and losses, then it may be beneficial to consult with a local medical malpractice attorney to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim for you.

Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who be able to assist you with your medical malpractice claim or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Is This Medical Malpractice? When A Good Deed Results In Death

Tuesday, April 10th, 2012

One of the saddest stories we recently heard regarding a possible medical malpractice incident occurred in May, 2010 in the operating room of a major transplant hospital in the United States when a living liver donor died on the operating room table while giving the gift of life to his brother-in-law who needed a liver transplant in order to survive, due to circumstances that raise the spectre of whether medical malpractice contributed to his death.

We are hesitant to use the term “organ donor” in describing the man who made the ultimate sacrifice in an attempt to help another human being in desperate need of a liver transplant because the phrase is too impersonal and too understated in the context of the altruistic compassion and utter selflessness of the man who tried to help save his brother-in-law on his wife’s 57th birthday. But we will use the term organ donor in referring to the man out of respect for the over 100,000 others in the United States who have donated kidneys, portions of livers, and other live organs that have saved lives and made the lives of organ recipients much better.

Did The Man Die Due To Medical Malpractice?

When the man was told that his brother-in-law was in dire straits due to his rapidly failing liver, he did not hesitate to step up to the plate to volunteer, without being asked, to be tested to see if he was a compatible liver donor. When the medical testing confirmed that he was a compatible living donor, he bravely took the next step by arranging to have a portion (60%) of his liver transplanted into his brother-in-law.

The donor was 56-years-old at the time of the transplant surgery and was believed by his wife to be in good health. Medical testing was done to confirm that the donor was a good candidate for the surgery and for the removal of a portion of his liver. As far as the donor’s wife knew, her husband was told that there was no reason why he could not undergo the surgery necessary to donate a part of his liver. Little did the wife know that a pre-operative EKG was abnormal (it showed that her husband may have had a previous heart attack) and what consideration was given to the abnormal EKG in the context of whether the transplant surgery should have proceeded.

The transplant team decided on using laparoscopic surgery in which the surgery is performed through three small incisions from which donors typically recover faster and with less pain than with the usual “open” surgery. A significant drawback from laparoscopic surgery is that the internal view is limited and therefore if excessive internal bleeding is encountered, it may be more difficult to determine and address the source of the bleeding.

That is what complicated the surgery on the liver donor in this case — a vein coming from his liver was partially torn during the laparoscopic surgery and then completed separated, causing serious bleeding. As the surgeons worked on the torn vein, other tears developed and other sources of bleeding were causing internal bleeding that the surgeons were unable to keep up with (a portable high-speed blood pump that could have helped was available but not brought into the operating room for some unexplained reason).

The transplant surgeons failed to activate the hospital’s “Massive Blood Transfusion Protocol” that may have helped provide the man with blood transfusions at a faster rate. The man died on the operating table two and a half hours after he first started to bleed from the torn vein, due to cardiac arrest caused by the excessive bleeding.

There have been more than 4,500 live liver donors involved in transplants in the United States over the last 25 years, including more than 200 at the same transplant center as where the man’s surgery was performed, with only three previous deaths of donors since 1999.

Source

The ability to save and improve lives through the transplantation of human organs is one of the greatest triumphs of modern medicine. Very few transplant donors ever suffer any complications from their surgery, let alone die due to surgery. One of the reasons for such success is due to the procedures and protocols established by the transplant hospitals to provide pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative methods to insure the best possible outcome for the organ donors and organ recipients.

While procedures and protocols may not necessarily establish the standard of care required of the transplant team, the established procedures and protocols are evidence of the standard of care. When the established procedures and protocols are not followed or enforced, dire consequences, such as the death of the organ donor or the organ recipient, may result.

If you, a family member, a loved one, or a friend suffered injuries or losses due to possible medical malpractice in a hospital, in a medical office or clinic, or at the hands of another medical provider, you should promptly seek the advice of a medical malpractice attorney to answer your medical malpractice questions and to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim.

Click here to visit our website or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in  your state who may be able to assist you with your potential medical malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Two Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Lawsuits Filed Against California Nursing Home

Sunday, April 1st, 2012

A California nursing home in Northern California recently had two medical malpractice wrongful death cases filed against it for the deaths of two of its residents that occurred during 2011.

Case No. 1

In the first case, a man was admitted into the hospital in January, 2011, for treatment of his kidney disease and an infection. After being treated in the hospital, he was discharged to the nursing home for what was supposed to be a short stay for physical rehabilitation while his family arranged for medical care at his home. While in the nursing home, less than one hour after being left alone in his bed in his room, he was found lying unconscious on the floor of his room, suffering from a head injury. He died in the hospital two days later due to brain swelling.

The medical malpractice case filed by his family alleges that the nursing home failed to hire enough staff to take care of its residents’ needs, including the man who died, and that the negligence of the nursing home and its staff led to the man’s injuries and death.

Case No. 2

In the second case, a woman was transferred in February, 2011 from a hospital where she had been treated for her breathing problems to the nursing home for rehabilitative care. The medications that the woman was supposed to get at the nursing home included morphine sulfate and Xanax, which were ordered to be given three times a day (that is, every eight hours). Instead, as the medical malpractice case filed on behalf of her estate alleges, she was given the morphine sulfate and the Xanax at 9 a.m., 1 p.m., and 5 p.m. (that is, every four hours during the day time hours), which caused her to receive much more morphine sulfate and Xanax over a much shorter period of time than prescribed by her doctors.

The medical malpractice lawsuit alleges that as a result of being over-medicated with the morphine sulfate and the Xanax, the woman became medically distressed and had to be transported to a hospital emergency room for evaluation and treatment. The woman was diagnosed as having been overdosed with morphine that was causing kidney failure. She died two and a half weeks later in the hospital from acute renal failure that was allegedly caused by the medication overdose.

Source

Medication errors in nursing homes are not uncommon. Medication errors in nursing homes include the failure to provide the prescribed medications to the appropriate residents at the proper times, giving the wrong medications to the wrong residents, giving multiple medications to residents in combinations that are contra-indicated or dangerous, and not promptly and appropriately addressing changes in the residents’ physical and/or mental conditions that may require a change in medications or dosages, etc. Any medication error in a nursing home can cause harm (or worse) to a resident, especially in an elderly population or very sick population such as found in most nursing homes.

Nursing home medication errors may also result from residents being unable to participate in their own medical care such as questioning the medications that are being given to them, due to their dementia or other medical or mental conditions (for instance, a patient in a hospital who has been receiving a “blue pill” every four hours may question why all of a sudden a “pink pill” is being offered to the patient whereas a nursing home resident who may not have all of his/her mental faculties may not notice the change or be aware that he/she should question the change).

If you, a loved one, a family member, or someone you know has suffered injuries in a nursing home that may be due to medical negligence, you should consult with a medical malpractice attorney who may be able to investigate a possible medical malpractice claim.

Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to assist you with a medical malpractice claim for nursing home neglect or nursing home abuse. You may also reach us by toll free telephone call to 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

The Impact Of Anesthesia Medical Malpractice On Practitioners

Tuesday, March 13th, 2012

In an article published in the March, 2012 issue of the journal Anesthesia & Analgesia, the results of a survey sent to 1,200 randomly selected members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, of which 659 completed and returned the survey, found that 84% of the respondents had been involved in at least one unanticipated death or serious injury of a patient during surgery during their careers.

The results of this survey do not address the specifics of the unanticipated catastrophic events so we are unable to determine how many of the events were due to substandard medical care (medical malpractice) and how many were not due to medical negligence. Nonetheless, the survey results shed some light on the emotional impact that unanticipated medical events have on the medical practitioners who are involved in patient care.

The reported emotional impact on these anesthesiologists from their unanticipated events included feelings of guilt, anxiety, and the reliving of the events (over 70% reported such issues). The vast majority of the survey respondents also reported that they needed time to emotionally recover from the event (88%), with 19% reporting that they never fully recovered.

The emotional impact on some was so severe that 12% considered changing their careers due to the event. Sixty seven percent of the respondents felt that their ability to continue to provide patient care was compromised during the immediate 4 hours after the event but only 7% of them were offered time off.

Source

We must never forget that medical providers are human beings with emotional needs and emotional responses to unusual or unanticipated events. Not all “bad outcomes” from medical care are due to medical malpractice but the effect on people’s lives may be the same — painful and permanent injuries that last a lifetime, which may be shortened due to the medical mistakes. It is when the medical provider breached the standard of care (that is, committed medical malpractice) that the injured may seek and obtain compensation from their negligent medical providers for their losses.

If you or a family member may have been injured as a result of medical malpractice, the services of a medical malpractice attorney may be essential in investigating your possible medical malpractice claim and explaining to you your legal rights in the matter.

If you believe that you may be the victim of medical malpractice, click here to visit our website  to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be willing to investigate your medical malpractice claim for you and bring a medical malpractice case on your behalf, if appropriate. If you prefer, you may also call us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Kentucky Medical Malpractice Jury Awards Man’s Estate $1.45 Million, After 13 Years

Wednesday, March 7th, 2012

Back in 1999, a paraplegic man went to a local Kentucky hospital’s emergency room, complaining of  abdominal pain along with vomiting and constipation that were treated with an enema and pain medication before the man was discharged from the emergency room. That night, the man was vomiting blood all night and had severe abdominal pain. He returned to the hospital’s emergency room where laboratory tests indicated that he was critically sick, but he was discharged anyway, according to the medical malpractice case. The man died several hours later from peritonitis and a ruptured peptic ulcer.

A medical malpractice case was filed on behalf of the man’s estate in 2000 against the hospital and others, which included an allegation that the hospital engaged in the illegal practice of “patient dumping” that involves refusing to treat patients who are uninsured. The medical malpractice claim also included an allegation that the hospital threatened to call the police if the man returned to the emergency room.

The first medical malpractice jury trial ended in a mistrial. The second medical malpractice jury trial in 2005 resulted in a verdict against the hospital in the amount of $1.5 million in punitive damages, which was appealed. As a result of the appeal, a third jury trial that lasted three weeks until the end of February, 2012, resulted in the $1.45 million verdict for punitive damages in favor of the man’s estate. The hospital has vowed to appeal this latest jury verdict.

Source

What Is Peritonitis?

Peritonitis is the inflammation of the peritoneum, which is the thin tissue that lines the inner wall of the abdomen and covers most of the abdominal organs. Peritonitis is life threatening so that its cause must be identified and treated promptly, often by surgery and antibiotics. Symptoms of peritonitis may include a very painful, tender, or distended (bloated) abdomen, which is often painful with movement or when touched. Other symptoms may include fever, chills, abdominal fluid, inability or reduced ability to pass stools or gas, decreased urine,  excessive fatigue, nausea, and vomiting.

Source

The man’s peritonitis was probably due to his ruptured peptic ulcer — the most common cause of secondary peritonitis is the spread of an infection from the digestive tract.

If you have been misdiagnosed in a hospital emergency room or the emergency room was negligent in its treatment of your condition, you may be entitled to monetary compensation for the injuries and suffering that you sustained as a result of the medical mistakes or errors. Often it is necessary to engage the services of a medical malpractice attorney to investigate the cause(s) of your injuries to determine if you have been harmed by medical malpractice.

Click here to visit our website  to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to investigate whether you have a valid claim for medical malpractice and to represent you in your medical malpractice claim, if appropriate. If you prefer, you may also contact us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

New Jersey Medical Malpractice Verdict For Man Who Died From Pulmonary Embolism

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

A man went to a local New Jersey hospital’s emergency room to be examined and treated for chest pains and shortness of breath that he feared might be serious. He was seen in the emergency room by a doctor who diagnosed the man as having a virus. The emergency room doctor discharged the man to home without even offering him a prescription.

That night, the man’s condition worsened to the point that he thought that he was dying. He quickly wrote and signed his own will, naming his best friend as the executor of his estate. Early the next morning, the man lost consciousness and collapsed. His girlfriend called 911 but by the time the man arrived at the emergency department, he had died. It was determined that the man suffered a pulmonary embolism that lodged in the main artery of his lung, causing his death.

What Is Pulmonary Embolism?

Pulmonary embolism (“PE”) is a sudden blockage in a lung artery. The most common source of the blockage is a blood clot that traveled from a deep vein in a leg to the lungs, often due to deep vein thrombosis that involves the formation of blood clots in deep veins (most often in the deep veins of the legs). PE can cause death if the blood clot is large enough or if there are multiple clots. PE can also cause lung damage due to the lack of blood flow to part of the lung, which may result in a serious medical condition known as pulmonary hypertension (increased pressure in the pulmonary arteries). PE can also result in reduced blood oxygenation that can lead to damage to various organs in the body.

PE and deep vein thrombosis affect between 300,000 and 600,000 people in the United States each year. About 30% of people with PE die if not treated promptly. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of PE is essential in order to prevent complications or death from PE.

Source

How Is Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosed?

Blood clots in deep veins may be diagnosed using ultrasound before they can travel to the lungs and cause PE. CT scans may be used to look for blood clots in the legs or lungs. A VQ scan (a lung ventilation/profusion scan that uses radioisotopes that shows both air flow and blood flow through the lungs) can help determine blood oxygenation to the lungs. In some cases, pulmonary angiography may be performed (pulmonary angiography involves inserting a catheter through the groin or arm into the lungs during which a dye is injected and x-rays taken to determine blood flow through the lungs).

Source

How Is Pulmonary Embolism Treated?

Blood thinners (anticoagulants) such as heparin and/or warfarin may be used to make it more difficult for blood to clot (anticoagulants do not break up clots that have already formed; most blood clots are dissolved over time). In emergency situations,  thrombolytics may be given to patients that quickly dissolve large blood clots although thrombolytics can be dangerous because they can cause sudden bleeding. A catheter may be inserted to either remove the blood clot or to deliver drugs directly to the area of the blood clot to dissolve the blood clot.

Source

What Are Some Of The Symptoms Of Possible Pulmonary Embolism?

Some of the more common signs and symptoms of possible PE include unexplained shortness of breath, problems breathing, chest pain, coughing, or coughing up blood.

Source

In the New Jersey man’s case, the man complained of shortness of breath and chest pain while he was in the emergency room (two of the signs and symptoms of PE). Nonetheless, the medical malpractice defendants argued that the man did not have PE until the next morning, shortly before he died.

The medical malpractice jury evidently did not believe the defense because it awarded the man’s estate $1,065,000 on January 31, 2012, after three weeks of trial.

Source

If you were the victim of medical malpractice in New Jersey or in any other state in the United States, you may be entitled to compensation if you incurred medical expenses, sustained other economic losses, and/or suffered noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering, mental anguish, disfigurement, etc.

The advice of medical malpractice attorneys may help you determine if you were the victim of medical negligence and if you can file a medical malpractice claim for your injuries and losses.

Click here to visit our website  or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim for you and bring a medical malpractice case on your behalf, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Claim For Good Deed Turned Deadly

Saturday, February 25th, 2012

An unmarried couple who had been together for 21 years and had an eighteen-year-old son together had to deal with a life-altering situation when the man’s kidneys were failing due to his diabetes and kidney dialysis wasn’t working well for him. Out of a sense of compassion and caring, the woman offered to donate one of her kidneys to the man to save his life. Repeated routine blood testing of the donor showed that she had hepatitis C, a serious and potentially life-threatening virus that can destroy the liver, that would have disqualified her as a kidney donor.

Nonetheless, the woman was not told that she had hepatitis C and the kidney transplant was performed. The transplantation itself went well. Afterwards, the man was diagnosed with hepatitis C. According to the medical malpractice lawsuit, the hospital tried to blame the woman for causing the man to contract hepatitis C and tried to cover up its mistake by asking the woman to keep the man’s hepatitis C diagnosis from him.

The medical treatment for the man’s hepatitis C can harm his new kidney and result in organ failure and death. The man and woman have filed two medical malpractice lawsuits against the hospital, the doctors involved with his kidney transplant, and other medical staff.

Source

Between 2007 and 2010, more than 200 cases of suspected (but unexpected) transmission of serious viruses as a result of transplanted organs were investigated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In general, a kidney transplanted from a living donor is better than a kidney from a cadaver. There are nearly 17,000 kidney transplants performed in the United States each year, with almost 6,200 of the kidneys coming  from living donors. There are more than 28,000 organs of all types that are transplanted in the United States each year, which falls way short of the 112,000 people who need organ transplants and the more than 6,500 people who die each year waiting for a donor organ to become available.

Source

Organ transplantation offers a better quality of life to organ recipients and an opportunity to live a longer life. Medical advancements have allowed organ transplantation to come a long way towards accomplishing both goals. But despite advances in transplantation techniques and organ rejection medications, we must still rely on the human factor in ensuring the best possible outcome from organ transplants.

Since organ transplants first became part of mainstream medicine, medical experts participating in transplant programs have known how important it is to ensure that the proper donor organs are transplanted into the proper organ recipients. It is generally accepted that the health history of the donor must be examined and medical tests performed to make sure that the organ donor is an appropriate candidate to donate an organ. Viruses such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and the virus that causes AIDS can reside in the blood and the organs of organ donors and it is imperative that the proper testing be done of the organ donor to minimize danger to the organ recipient; after all, medical ethics is ruled by the maxim expressed by the Latin phrase primum non nocere (“first, do no harm).”

If the allegation in the Pennsylvania medical malpractice case that the hospital should have known by the results of the woman’s blood tests that she had hepatitis C before she became a kidney donor for her long-time companion is true, then it would be an egregious violation of the the man’s rights and a clear breach of the standard of care (that is, medical malpractice) to have not advised the woman with regard to her hepatitis C status and to have transplanted her kidney into her companion, especially without advising the man of the situation.

We must put our faith and trust in the expertise and ethics of our health care providers in making appropriate medical decisions with regard to our medical care and treatment because they are the ones with the specialized knowledge and training that we lack in deciding our own fate. However, our medical providers are duty-bound to fully and properly advise us of our medical conditions and medical treatment options so that we may make an informed decision as to our medical treatment. If our medical providers hide from us information that a reasonable patient would want and expect to know about his or her condition or medical treatment, then the medical providers have breached their duty and may be held accountable for their actions.

When the actions or omissions of a medical provider may be the cause of serious injuries or even death, the services of a medical malpractice attorney may be essential in determining if medical malpractice has occurred.

Click here to visit our website  to be connected with local medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you in investigating your possible medical malpractice claim and to represent you in your medical malpractice case, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!