Blog

Archive for the ‘Pharmaceutical Medical Malpracitce’ Category

$50 Million Settlement Paid By Drug Supplier To Nursing Homes

Monday, May 14th, 2012

A company that provides drugs to nursing homes and other long-term care facilities recently settled federal civil claims against it that alleged that the company dispensed drugs to nursing homes without proper prescriptions for the medications. The $50 million settlement involves allegations that the company violated the provisions of the federal Controlled Substances Act that regulates drug distribution in the United States.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration had investigated the company’s practices and procedures and found that the company sometimes dispensed drugs without prescriptions or without properly written prescriptions. Some of the improperly filled medication orders failed to state the name of the drug, the strength of the drug, the quantity of the drug, and/or the dose of the drug. The issue involved how the pharmacy managers communicated with the prescribing doctors at the nursing homes regarding the controlled medications.

The settlement with the federal government recognizes the obligation of pharmacies to receive signed prescriptions containing all of the required contents of prescriptions for controlled substances or to speak directly to the prescribers in emergency situations. The investigation had found that it was not an uncommon practice for pharmacies to dispense medications to nursing homes under the instructions of the nursing home staff who did not have the authority to prescribe controlled substances and without the patients’ doctors being involved in the process.

The federal government’s investigation did not involve allegations that the drugs received from the pharmacies were diverted to people other than the appropriate nursing home residents and the investigation did not involve the nurses or others who gave the medications to the nursing home residents.

Source

Because many of the residents in nursing homes are taking multiple medications for their medical and other conditions, and all of the nursing home residents who take multiple medications must be closely, carefully, and constantly monitored regarding the effects of their medications, it is imperative that the residents’ physicians are made fully aware of their patients’ medical conditions, changes in their medical conditions, and the medications and other therapies being provided to their patients. Medical mistakes involving the care of nursing home residents and medical errors involving the medications that nursing home residents rely on can result in serious or deadly consequences for the  residents.

Failure to follow procedures and protocols in nursing homes and sloppy record-keeping regarding the care and medications provided to nursing home residents are often cited as the basis for medical malpractice claims brought against nursing homes when residents suffer unanticipated and serious outcomes in nursing homes.

If you or a loved one suffered injury or death as a result of nursing home negligence, the prompt advice from a local medical malpractice attorney may be essential in protecting your legal rights.

Click here to visit our website or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to investigate a possible nursing home claim for you and file a medical malpractice case on your behalf, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on FacebookTwitterGoogle+, and LinkedIn as well!

Accutane Jury Verdict Upheld

Friday, May 11th, 2012

Accutane (isotretinoin) is a prescription acne medication manufactured by Hoffman-La Roche that was first introduced in the United States in 1982. Accutane was used to treat severe acne (nodular and/or inflammatory acne) that could not be cleared up by using other acne treatments, such as antibiotics. Accutane was removed from the market in 2009 after many lawsuits were filed regarding serious side effects from Accutane.

Side effects of using Accutane may include dryness of the skin and mucous membranes, photophobia, muscle and joint pain, insomnia, lethargy, visual disturbances, hearing deficiencies, headache, nausea, malaise, drowsiness, amnesia, hallucinations, behavioral disorders, seizures, psychosis, schizophrenia, depression, suicide ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide.

Source

Studies of the generic version of Accutane (isotretinoin) have also linked its use to a serious risk of birth defects and to bowel disorders such as inflammatory bowel diseases, including ulcerative colitis. According to preliminary research evidence presented to the American College of Gastroenterology in January, 2009, the risk of being diagnosed with ulcerative colitis in isotretinoin users was more than four times greater than in the general population, and patients who had filled four or more prescriptions for Accutane had a risk of inflammatory bowel disease that was more than 2.5 times greater than in the general population.

A New Jersey Accutane Lawsuit

A New Jersey woman who had used Accutane for six months in 1998 allegedly developed inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis) six weeks after she stopped taking Accutane. She alleged in her lawsuit that she would not have taken Accutane had she been made aware of the possible side effects. The jury hearing her case decided that the woman was entitled to $2 million in damages because Hoffman-La Roche failed to adequately warn her about the risks of taking Accutane, including developing ulcerative colitis.  Hoffman-La Roche was dissatisfied with the jury’s verdict and appealed its decision. A judge recently upheld the jury’s verdict.

Source

Accutane (isotretinoin) is a vitamin A derivative belonging to the retinoid class of medicines, which are used to treat skin conditions. The manner in which Accutane works is not known but it is believed to act on the sebaceous glands that produce oil/wax to reduce sebum excretion, which may indirectly reduce bacterial activity associated with acne and thereby improve acne. To read more from the manufacturer about Accutane, click here.

If you have been injured as a result of taking Accutane or another drug in the United States, you may be entitled to compensation for your losses and injuries. A medical malpractice attorney versed in such claims may be able to assist you with your possible drug claim.

Click here to visit our website or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you with a drug claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

$1.6 BILLION Pharmaceutical Company Payment For Off-Labeling Marketing

Tuesday, May 8th, 2012

The large pharmaceutical company Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) has agreed to pay $1.6 billion, the second largest payment by a drug company, to settle an investigation into its drug marketing practices (the largest payment was $2.3 billion that was paid by Pfizer Inc. in 2009). The $1.6 billion includes $700 million in criminal fines and forfeiture and $800 million to settle civil claims brought by states and the federal government.

Additionally, Abbott agreed to pay $100 million to resolve state consumer protection claims, to plead guilty to a misdemeanor violation of  the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, and to be subjected to court-supervised probation for a five year period.

The settlements, payments, and guilty plea are related to Abbott’s misbranding (improper promotion/marketing) of its drug named Depakote. The only uses of Depakote that are approved by the FDA are for treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and in the prevention of migraines. One of the known safety risks of Depakote is liver disease. Sales of Depakote reached $1.7 billion in 2007.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Abbott promoted Depakote in controlling agitation and aggression in elderly dementia patients as well as in treating schizophrenia, both of which were not approved uses of Depakote by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Such improper marketing is often referred to as “off-label” use.

Abbott admitted that the off-label use of Depakote for elderly dementia patients who were agitated or aggressive in nursing homes was actively promoted by a specialized sales force between 1998 and 2006 despite no credible scientific evidence that Depakote was safe and effective for such use (Abbott discontinued a clinical trial of Depakote’s use in treating dementia in 1999 due to adverse effects such as dehydration, anorexia, and drowsiness). Additionally, Abbott also admitted that it paid millions of dollars in rebates to pharmacists who serviced nursing homes based on how much Depakote’s use was increased in the nursing homes that they serviced.

Abbott further admitted that Depakote’s use for treatment of schizophrenia in combination with other drugs was actively promoted between 2001 and 2006 without evidence that it was any more effective than other medications alone in the treatment of schizophrenia (two studies of Depakote’s use in the treatment of schizophrenia that were paid for by Abbott failed to meet their goals, which Abbott did not report to its sales force for two years and which were not published for an additional two years).

The recently announced settlements will result in some ”whistle-blowers” receiving about $84 million as their share of the federal government’s recovery pursuant to the False Claims Act that provides for such incentives. The whistle-blowers had filed four lawsuits in federal court in Virginia regarding Abbott’s improper marketing promotion of off-label uses for Depakote.

Source

Without the monetary incentives provided under the False Claims Act for whistle-blowers, one must wonder if the illegal activities of a giant pharmaceutical company would have been discovered and punished.

If you have a possible whistle-blower claim against a drug company or other large company in the United States, you may wish to consult with a medical malpractice lawyer or other attorney who is knowledgeable about whistle-blower claims and handles such claims.

Click here to visit our website to be connected with whistle-blower lawyers in your local area who may be able to advise you regarding your whistle-blower responsibilities and possible monetary recovery and to assist you in filing a whistle-blower claim, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Inappropriate Use Of Anti-Psychotic Medications In Nursing Homes

Thursday, May 3rd, 2012

Federal data recently reviewed by a major newspaper pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request reveals that the inappropriate use of anti-psychotic medications for nursing home residents is rampant. Anti-psychotic medications are typically used in the treatment of severe mental disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

About 185,000 nursing home residents in the United States during 2010 were given anti-psychotic medications when it was inappropriate to do so. More than 1 in 5 U.S. nursing homes used anti-psychotic medications for a significant percentage of residents who did not have psychosis or other serious mental conditions.

The use of anti-psychotic medications in patients with dementia is particularly dangerous, earning FDA black-box warnings regarding potentially fatal side effects. Anti-psychotic medications can cause dizziness, abnormal heart rhythms, a sudden drop in blood pressure, blurred vision, increased risk of deadly infections, cardiovascular complications, and urinary problems.

Nursing homes sometimes give anti-psychotic medications to combative or aggressive residents under the pretext of preventing the residents from harming themselves or others. However, the statistics seem to lend support to the belief that anti-psychotic medications administered to nursing home residents may be used to sedate and control residents who simply need more attention and care from nursing home staff — more care and attention means more time spent with residents, which in turn requires more staff time (and more staff), which means higher costs for nursing home owners.

The newspaper reported that at least 25% of nursing home residents without conditions recommended for anti-psychotic medication use nonetheless received the anti-psychotic medications in 21% of U.S. nursing homes in 2010. There was a direct link between the staffing of the nursing homes and their rate of use of anti-psychotic medications for their residents — the fewer the staff involved with the residents’ direct care, the greater the rate of anti-psychotic medication use for non-recommended conditions. The nursing homes that used anti-psychotic medications for conditions other than psychosis and similar mental conditions tended to have more residents that the nursing home staff identified as having behavioral problems such as wandering, verbal abuse, physical abuse, or being resistant to care, and the nursing homes themselves had a higher percentage of residents whose care was paid for by Medicaid and not by private insurance.

The newspaper reported that 10 nursing homes in California during 2010 administered anti-psychotic medication to all of their residents who were without psychosis or a related mental condition. On the other side of the spectrum, 146 nursing homes in the U.S. did not use anti-psychotic medications for their residents without psychosis or a related mental condition (that is about 1% of the nursing homes in the United States with at least 50 residents).

Source

If your family member or a loved one was mistreated, abused, or neglected in a nursing home in the United States, the assistance of a local medical malpractice attorney may help in investigating a possible medical malpractice claim against the nursing home.

Click here to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you in bringing a medical malpractice claim against the nursing home.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Epidemic Of Drug Babies In The U.S.

Tuesday, May 1st, 2012

Babies born addicted to drugs due to their mothers’ use of illicit drugs during pregnancy is not new. However, an increasing epidemic of babies addicted to prescription medications, especially narcotics such as oxycodone, is particularly alarming.

Many such newborns will be born with neonatal abstinence syndrome (“NAS”), which is the withdrawal process they go through once they are born as a result of no longer being exposed to the drugs their mothers used during pregnancy (narcotic medications such as oxycodone pass through the placental barrier during pregnancy). In 2009, more than 13,000 newborns in the U.S. were born with NAS, a three-fold increase since 2000 (opiate use by pregnant mothers increased five-fold during the same period).

How many babies exposed to opioids during pregnancy go through withdrawal symptoms once they are born? Between 55% and 94%, according to official statistics.

Many NAS babies share common symptoms:  they are easily agitated, cry constantly (many have a distinct, high-pitched cry), they cannot be around sound or light, and they may have muscle tightening and seizures.

Tennessee’s Recent Experience With NAS Newborns

Tennessee ranks among the U.S. states with the greatest overuse of prescription drugs. About one-third of pregnant Tennessee women in state drug treatment programs are addicted to pain medications. In one particular Tennessee hospital, the number of NAS newborns doubled from 2010 to 2011. As a result, this same hospital responded by creating a new wing of private rooms in 2010 that are quieter and darker to help in the treatment of NAS babies.

The Tennessee hospital used to treat NAS babies in a manner similar to the treatment of older addicts — methadone treatment was used to stabilize the newborns who were then discharged to outpatient treatment. Due to safety and effectiveness concerns with the methadone treatment protocol for newborns, the hospital switched to morphine in small doses given every three hours during feeding that is gradually reduced over the following weeks to wean the babies off of the drugs. This newer treatment protocol has reduced the average hospital stay for NAS babies by several days, which now averages 24 days.

And it is not just at the time of birth and for the weeks following birth that NAS babies are at risk. Studies have shown that NAS babies are at an increased risk for learning problems and developmental problems throughout childhood and for behavioral problems as they reach school age.

Source

If you or a family member have become the victim of medical malpractice in Tennessee or in another state in the U.S., it is important to learn about your legal rights. The advice from a local medical malpractice attorney may help you determine if you can and should proceed with a medical malpractice claim.

Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be willing to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim for you and to file a medical malpractice case on your behalf, if appropriate. You may also reach us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Maine Medical Malpractice Verdict For Methadone Overdose

Tuesday, April 17th, 2012

Earlier this month, a medical malpractice jury in Maine deliberated for less than two hours before unanimously awarding a woman compensatory damages in the amount of $1,912,934 for her alleged brain damage caused by her doctor over-prescribing methadone that resulted in her experiencing an episode of slow and shallow breathing during the night which deprived her of oxygen. The woman had been taking the prescribed methadone for only two and half days before she suffered her injuries.

The woman had been living with chronic back pain for which her primary care physician referred her in August, 2006 to a family practice specialist for treatment of her chronic pain. The medical malpractice claim alleged that the woman had been given a prescription for methadone by the family practice specialist at a dose eight times the recommended dosage.

The medical malpractice defendant argued to the medical malpractice jury that the woman had failed to mention to the pharmacist at the time she filled her prescription for methadone that she had pre-existing breathing problems and sleep apnea. The defense also argued that the 40 mg dose prescribed for the woman was within an appropriate range and that the pharmacy’s computerized system for warning of complications, side effects, or other problems with the prescription did not indicate a problem with the dosage prescribed for the woman and that the pharmacist who filled the prescription had called to confirm the prescription and did not indicate any problem with the prescription.

The medical malpractice defendant’s attorney also argued to the jury that the woman never intended to return to her job with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, where she had worked for 18 years, and therefore her claim for lost wages should not be awarded by the medical malpractice jury. And while the medical malpractice plaintiff claimed her alleged brain damage affected her ability to perform simple tasks and to multitask at work, the medical malpractice defendant argued that the woman’s family did not notice any changes in the woman’s demeanor or behavior during the two and a half days the woman was taking the methadone before the incident.

Source

Many people associate methadone with its use in treating heroin addicts (opiate addiction). However, methadone is also used to treat moderate to severe pain that has not been relieved by use of non-narcotic pain relievers.

Methadone is a narcotic analgesic that treats pain by changing the way the brain and nervous system responds to pain (methadone is used to treat abusers of opiate drugs by producing similar effects while preventing withdrawal symptoms when the abused drugs are stopped).

The official “warnings” regarding use of methadone include the following: “Methadone may cause slowed breathing and irregular heartbeat, which may be life-threatening. If you experience any of the following symptoms, call your doctor immediately: difficulty breathing; extreme drowsiness; slow, shallow breathing; fast, slow, pounding, or irregular heartbeat; faintness; severe dizziness; or confusion.

The risk that you will experience serious or life-threatening side effects of methadone is greatest when you first start taking methadone, when you switch from another narcotic medication to methadone and when your doctor increases your dose of methadone. Your doctor may start you on a low dose of methadone and gradually increase your dose. Your doctor will monitor you closely during this time.”

Source

The standard of care requires physicians and other health care providers with the authority to prescribe medications to use that degree of care and skill that similarly situated medical providers would use under similar circumstances. Sometimes a questionable or unusual prescription is flagged by the filling pharmacist when the pharmacy’s computer system provides a warning regarding the information about the prescription entered into the computer system. When that happens, the pharmacist may use his/her knowledge, education, and experience in responding to the computer’s warning, which may range from disregarding the warning as unwarranted to not filling the prescription and speaking with the prescriber regarding the pharmacist’s concerns.

While a pharmacist may also be held responsible for filling a prescription in a manner that violates the pharmacist’s standard of care, the prescribing health care provider remains liable under most circumstances and cannot rely on and expect to be excused of the health care provider’s own negligence by the subsequent negligence of the pharmacist.

If you or loved one have been injured or suffered losses as a result of a prescription medication or an over-the-counter medication, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries, pain, and other losses. The prompt advice of a medical malpractice attorney may be essential in protecting your legal rights and obtaining fair compensation.

Click here to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to assist you with a possible medical malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Pharmacy Error Was The Cause Of Chicago Infant’s Death

Sunday, April 15th, 2012

In 2010, a couple gave birth to a son who was four months premature. The parents stayed by their baby’s bedside for six weeks in the hospital, caring for and nurturing their delicate newborn. On October 15, 2010, the baby had heart surgery but suddenly died from unknown causes.

An investigation into the infant’s sudden and unexpected death determined that a pharmacy technician using an electronic system entered the incorrect information for the baby that resulted in a massive unintended overdose of sodium chloride, resulting in the baby’s death.

This tragic incident may have been avoided had the automated alerts in the IV compounding machine been turned on. The pharmacy error was further complicated by the label on the IV bag stating the incorrect concentration of the solution. The identification of the pharmacy mistake was delayed when a lab technician reading the infant’s blood test results believed that the abnormally high sodium indication was an inaccurate test result.

Upon discovering the pharmacy error and other medical mistakes that contributed to the unfortunate death of the baby, the hospital implemented changes in policies and procedures to avoid future similar pharmacy errors, including activating alerts in the IV compounder machines and further strengthening checks before medications leave the pharmacy.

The hospital has settled the medical malpractice lawsuit that had been brought on behalf of the infant’s parents, in the amount of $8.25 million, which settlement was approved by the court on April 5, 2012.

Source

Medication errors by hospitals and retail pharmacies unfortunately are not uncommon. Many medications have similar sounding names or similar spellings that may result in the wrong medications being filled. The dosages of many medications vary according to what the medical care providers prescribed. A pharmacist or less-trained pharmacy technician may intend to fill a prescription with 0.5 ml of a medication but instead fill the prescription with 5 ml, which may be disastrous for the patient if the mistake is not caught before the medication leaves the pharmacy and is administered to the patient.

The increasing use of electronic devices and computer software in pharmacies to lessen the likelihood of a wrong prescription being filled have reduced pharmacy mistakes but human error continues to be a major source of pharmacy errors. A computer may catch and alert to a pharmacy error in filling a prescription but only if the human inputs the full and correct information into the computer. Mistakes can occur when a pharmacist or pharmacy assistant who is used to filling certain medications at certain dosages puts the “usual” dosing information into the pharmacy computer for a patient whose prescription differs from the typical dosage. Complacency and routine in filling medications may also result in inadvertant pharmacy errors.

The vast majority of pharmacy errors are due to negligence and are unintentional. Nonetheless, the unintended injuries suffered as a result of a medication error are no less serious, permanent, and painful if the error was “simply a mistake.”

If you or a loved one suffered injuries or losses as a result of a medication error, pharmacy mistake, or pharmacy error in filling a prescription, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries and losses. The prompt assistance from a medical malpractice attorney in your local area may help you determine if you have a valid claim for pharmacy negligence.

Click here to visit our website or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you with your medical malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Two Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Lawsuits Filed Against California Nursing Home

Sunday, April 1st, 2012

A California nursing home in Northern California recently had two medical malpractice wrongful death cases filed against it for the deaths of two of its residents that occurred during 2011.

Case No. 1

In the first case, a man was admitted into the hospital in January, 2011, for treatment of his kidney disease and an infection. After being treated in the hospital, he was discharged to the nursing home for what was supposed to be a short stay for physical rehabilitation while his family arranged for medical care at his home. While in the nursing home, less than one hour after being left alone in his bed in his room, he was found lying unconscious on the floor of his room, suffering from a head injury. He died in the hospital two days later due to brain swelling.

The medical malpractice case filed by his family alleges that the nursing home failed to hire enough staff to take care of its residents’ needs, including the man who died, and that the negligence of the nursing home and its staff led to the man’s injuries and death.

Case No. 2

In the second case, a woman was transferred in February, 2011 from a hospital where she had been treated for her breathing problems to the nursing home for rehabilitative care. The medications that the woman was supposed to get at the nursing home included morphine sulfate and Xanax, which were ordered to be given three times a day (that is, every eight hours). Instead, as the medical malpractice case filed on behalf of her estate alleges, she was given the morphine sulfate and the Xanax at 9 a.m., 1 p.m., and 5 p.m. (that is, every four hours during the day time hours), which caused her to receive much more morphine sulfate and Xanax over a much shorter period of time than prescribed by her doctors.

The medical malpractice lawsuit alleges that as a result of being over-medicated with the morphine sulfate and the Xanax, the woman became medically distressed and had to be transported to a hospital emergency room for evaluation and treatment. The woman was diagnosed as having been overdosed with morphine that was causing kidney failure. She died two and a half weeks later in the hospital from acute renal failure that was allegedly caused by the medication overdose.

Source

Medication errors in nursing homes are not uncommon. Medication errors in nursing homes include the failure to provide the prescribed medications to the appropriate residents at the proper times, giving the wrong medications to the wrong residents, giving multiple medications to residents in combinations that are contra-indicated or dangerous, and not promptly and appropriately addressing changes in the residents’ physical and/or mental conditions that may require a change in medications or dosages, etc. Any medication error in a nursing home can cause harm (or worse) to a resident, especially in an elderly population or very sick population such as found in most nursing homes.

Nursing home medication errors may also result from residents being unable to participate in their own medical care such as questioning the medications that are being given to them, due to their dementia or other medical or mental conditions (for instance, a patient in a hospital who has been receiving a “blue pill” every four hours may question why all of a sudden a “pink pill” is being offered to the patient whereas a nursing home resident who may not have all of his/her mental faculties may not notice the change or be aware that he/she should question the change).

If you, a loved one, a family member, or someone you know has suffered injuries in a nursing home that may be due to medical negligence, you should consult with a medical malpractice attorney who may be able to investigate a possible medical malpractice claim.

Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to assist you with a medical malpractice claim for nursing home neglect or nursing home abuse. You may also reach us by toll free telephone call to 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

New Jersey Pharmacy Gave Children Cancer Drug Instead Of Fluoride Tablets

Monday, March 12th, 2012

A New Jersey CVS Pharmacy mistakenly filled prescriptions for chewable fluoride tablets for children with the similar-looking powerful breast cancer drug, Tamoxifen, during a more than two month period. CVS has admitted that a Chatham, New Jersey CVS Pharmacy filled the wrong prescriptions for children in as many as 50 families during the period from December 1, 2011 to February 20, 2012, without offering an explanation for how the repeated mistakes were made.

Fluoride has been added to municipal water supplies since the 1940s in the United States to help prevent tooth decay in children and others. With the advent of water bottles containing spring water without the addition of fluoride and other sources of water without the benefit of added fluoride, many children’s dentists prescribe flavored 0.5 mg fluoride tablets for their young patients. However, Tamoxifen, when chewed, would have a bad taste.

Source

Tamoxifen Facts

While there have not been any currently reported ill-effects on the children who may have mistakenly received and taken Tamoxifen instead of the intended flouride tablets, Tamoxifen is not intended for use by children.

Tamoxifen has been used for more than 30 years to treat breast cancer in both men and women. Tamoxifen works by interfering with the female hormone, estrogen. The known serious side effects of Tamoxifen include the formation of blood clots, strokes, cataracts, and cancer of the uterus.

Source

Fluoridation Facts

Grand Rapids, Michigan was the first city in the world to adjust fluoride in its water supply, beginning in 1945. Fluoridation has been credited as the single most effective public health measure to prevent tooth decay. The CDC has proclaimed municipal water flouridation as one of the ten most important public health achievements of the 20th century. As of 2002, over 170 million Americans were served by fluoridated public water supplies.

Fluoride appears naturally in drinking water but its level is adjusted in many public water supplies to between 0.7 and 1.2 parts per million, as recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service. Tooth decay in children between 5 and 17 is 5 times more common than asthma and 7 times more common than hay fever in that age group. Drinking water fluoridation reduces tooth decay by 20% to 40%.

The cost of fluoridation ranges between 50 cents per person per year in large communities to $3.00 per person per year in smaller communities. It is estimated that every $1.00 invested in water fluoridation results in savings of $38.00 in dental treatment costs. Nonetheless, only 67.3% of the U.S. population on public water supplies receive the recommended level of fluoridation in their drinking water.

Source

Pharmacy Medication Mistakes

We trust our hospital pharmacies, retail pharmacies, and mail-order pharmacies to be staffed with professional, knowledgeable,  and competent pharmacists and pharmacy staff who accurately and consistently fill our required prescriptions and provide appropriate advice regarding the medications we are prescribed. Mistakes made by pharmacies in filling prescriptions are never acceptable or expected.

Pharmacies are supposed to have systems and protocols in effect that are consistently employed in order to insure that each and every prescription is correctly filled. Medication errors may result from similar sounding medications, similarly spelled medications, or simple but unacceptable negligence in filling the prescriptions, such as dispensing the wrong medication.

Medication errors can result in permanent injuries or even death. If you may have received the wrong medication and suffered as a result of the medication mistake, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries and losses. The advice received from a medical malpractice attorney may help you determine if you may bring a claim for your suffering.

Visit our website by clicking here  or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to investigate your claim on your behalf and represent you with your claim, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Utah Supreme Court Upholds Healthcare Providers’ Duty To Nonpatients When Prescribing Medications

Saturday, March 3rd, 2012

In our blog posting for January  15, 2012 (“Did Utah Medical Malpractice Lead To Murder?”), we discussed the medical malpractice case filed on behalf of two very young children against the medical providers who prescribed medications to their father that allegedly caused a chemical change in his brain that led him to murder their mother. In response, the medical malpractice defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which the district court judge granted, stating that no duty of care extended from the medical malpractice defendants to the two children because “no patient-health care provider relationship existed, at the time of the underlying events, between the plaintiffs…and the defendants.”

An appeal of the dismissal of their medical malpractice case was filed on behalf of the children to the Supreme Court of Utah (“Supreme Court”). In  its decision  filed on February 28, 2012, the Supreme Court described the issue before it as follows: ”In this case we are asked to determine whether a physician owes nonpatients a duty to exercise reasonable care in the affirmative act of prescribing medications that pose a risk of injury to third parties.”

In deciding the issue, the Supreme Court’s opinion set forth an important distinction between negligent acts and negligent omissions:

[T]he distinction between acts and omissions is central to assessing whether a duty is owed [to] a plaintiff. In almost every instance, an act carries with it a potential duty and resulting legal accountability for that act. By contrast, an omission or failure to act can generally give rise to liability only in the presence of some external circumstance — a special relationship…Special relationships arise when one assumes responsibility for another’s safety or deprives another of his or her normal opportunities for self-protection…

After discussing the underlying facts of the case and the arguments of the parties to the appeal in its written opinion, the Supreme Court stated, “we affirm the existence of a duty on the part of healthcare providers to exercise reasonable care in prescribing medications that pose a risk of injury to third parties.” The Supreme Court noted that “Physicians — not third parties — are in a position to exercise ordinary care in prescribing medications so that patients do not pose an unreasonable risk of injury to others. As a medical expert, the prescribing physician can take into account the propensities of the drug, as well as the susceptibilities of his patient.”

The Supreme Court noted, however, that “A plaintiff must not only demonstrate that the provider‘s conduct fell outside the standard of professional care, but prove that the prescription was the proximate cause of a patient‘s harmful conduct.”

The Supreme Court’s decision concluded by stating, “Healthcare providers perform a societal function of undoubted social utility. But they are not entitled to an elevated status in tort law that would categorically immunize them from liability when their negligent prescriptions cause physical injury to nonpatients. We uphold a duty of healthcare providers to nonpatients in the affirmative act of prescribing medication, and reverse the district court‘s conclusion to the contrary.”

The case is captioned as Jeffs v. West,  2012 UT 11.  Click here  to read the Supreme Court’s opinion in full.

If you or a family member suffered ill-effects from a prescription medication,  you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries and losses. The prompt advice of a medical malpractice attorney may be essential to protecting your legal rights.

Click here to visit our website  to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to assist you with your possible medical malpractice claim. You may also reach us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!