Blog

Archive for the ‘Nevada Medical Malpractice’ Category

Las Vegas Medical Malpractice Claim For Surgery On The Wrong Knee

Friday, January 13th, 2012

Of all of the medical malpractice claims filed throughout the United States each year, it continues to astound us that surgeons are still being sued for medical malpractice based on claims that they operated on the wrong body part.

The simplest surgical decision occurs at the beginning of the operation: should I operate on the right side or on the left side of the patient?

Modern hospital protocols call for a formal “time out” in the operating room before the surgery starts, during which all of the operating room personnel stop what they are doing and confirm with one another the patient’s identification, the operative procedure to be performed, and the body part to be operated on (for example, “this is John Smith, date of birth xxxx, we are performing an ACL repair, and the surgery is on his left shoulder”). Hospitals also require that the surgical site be marked by using initials, the word “Yes,” or by a line representing the proposed incision — no other marks are allowed on the patient’s body (nonetheless, one doctor undergoing his own surgery reported that he wrote “wrong side” on one leg so that his surgeon would know that his surgery was to be performed on his other leg).

Maryland Wrong Knee Surgery

A Maryland medical malpractice lawyer was recently surprised to learn that the defendant orthopedic surgeon in a wrongful death medical malpractice case was sued just one year earlier for operating on another patient’s wrong knee (the defendant orthopedic surgeon arrogantly testified during his deposition that the patient’s “good knee” was found to have a condition that would have required surgery in the future anyway).

Las Vegas Wrong Knee Surgery

In Las Vegas, Nevada, a 54-year-old man was scheduled to have surgery on his right knee to clean out some cartilage. When he awoke after the surgery, he was surprised (and dismayed) to find that the bandages were placed on his left knee. His surgeon evidently realized shortly after the surgery that he had operated on the man’s wrong knee (the same surgeon had operated on the man’s left knee the previous year) and asked his patient, who was still under the effects of anesthesia from the original surgery, if he wanted surgery on his right (correct) knee at that time, to which the man responded, “Sure, why not?”  The surgeon then operated on his right knee.

Adding insult to injury, the surgeon and anesthesiologist joked that the man received two surgeries for the price of one (all joking aside, the surgeon had the audacity to bill his patient’s health insurance company for both surgeries!).

As a result of the two knee surgeries done at the same time (one of which was unnecessary), the man had to use a walker and was out of work for almost two months. And his recovery time from the surgery was twice as long. The man filed a medical malpractice claim against both his surgeon and the hospital, which blamed each other for the “mistake.”

Source

Even though it seems clear that operating on the wrong side of the body is medical malpractice, some negligent surgeons and the hospitals where the wrong site surgeries occurred still fight the medical malpractice claims as well as question the value of the unnecessary injuries caused to the innocent victims of the medical negligence.

If you or a loved one have been victimized by surgery performed on the wrong side or at the wrong site on your body, you should seek legal advice from a medical malpractice attorney at once.

Click here  to be forwarded to our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be willing and able to investigate your medical malpractice claim and file a medical malpractice case on your behalf, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!

Bad Butt Surgery Results In Nevada Medical Malpractice Claims

Saturday, January 7th, 2012

The survivors of a woman who died while undergoing butt enhancement surgery in the back room of a beauty salon in Nevada have filed wrongful death medical malpractice claims against the now-incarcerated husband and wife team who attempted the deadly cosmetic surgery.

The 42-year-old Las Vegas woman desired cosmetic surgery for enhancement of her buttocks. The employees of a beauty salon referred the woman to the unlicensed Colombian couple for the cut-rate cosmetic surgery procedure to be performed in the back room of the salon. The woman died during the procedure. An autopsy revealed that the woman was injected with lidocaine that caused her to have an unusual reaction that led to her death.

The Colombian couple were arrested as they attempted to board a flight to Colombia. In August, 2011, the couple pleaded guilty to two felonies (involuntary manslaughter and practicing medicine without a license) and one misdemeanor (conspiracy). They are presently serving four-to-eight years prison sentences.

Two separate medical malpractice cases were filed: one was filed by the surviving husband on his own behalf and on behalf of the two minor children of the victim, and the other was filed by the victim’s other daughter. Both medical malpractice cases are seeking damages in excess of $10,000.00.

Source

These medical malpractice cases should have been filed under the heading, “Really, this actually happened?”

Technically, the two wrongful death cases that were filed on behalf of the woman’s survivors are not medical malpractice cases because the alleged wrongdoers were not licensed medical providers. It should be much easier and less costly to prove the couple’s wrongful acts because there should be no need for medical experts to have to provide testimony with regard to the standard of care required of the couple had they been licensed medical professionals. Nonetheless, the plaintiffs may still need to provide expert medical testimony to establish the causal connection between the couple’s wrongful acts and the death of the woman. Inasmuch as the couple pleaded guilty to two felonies and one misdemeanor related to the incident, they may very well not challenge the claims of negligence against them.

Some Simplistic Observations

Perhaps the woman should have been leery of having cosmetic surgery done in the back room of a beauty salon. It may have been wise for her to investigate the qualifications and credentials of her hired enhancers. Maybe she should have asked for references before undergoing the elective procedure.

However you feel about the alleged facts of the claims and the wonan’s decision to have the elective cosmetic procedure done in the manner as stated above, the sad and unfortunate result was the woman’s unnecessary death. Whatever you may think about the woman’s sanity in undertaking the butt enhancement procedure as described, it is probably safe to assume that the woman had no idea that her bad decision would result in her death.

If you are intending to undergo a non-emergency medical or surgical procedure, no matter how minor it may seem, you should undertake your due diligence by investigating the reasons for the procedure, the availability of any less invasive alternatives to the proposed procedure, the manner in which the procedure is to be done, the location (facility) where the procedure will be done, and the qualifications, education, and experience of the medical personnel who will be providing you with necessary medical care and treatment (as well as whether resuscitation equipment will be available if the unexpected is encountered before, during, or after the procedure). Speaking with former patients who had the same or similar procedure done in the past and in the same facility with the same medical personnel, if at all possible, may help you in making informed decisions regarding your health and medical treatment. And don’t be afraid to ask questions — the only stupid questions are the ones not asked.

If you have been injured as a result of possible medical malpractice, you should seek the advice of medical malpractice attorneys who may be able to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim for you.

Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to help you with your medical malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!

Today’s 300th Consecutive Daily Blog Posting For MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

Today, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com is proud to celebrate its 300th consecutive daily blog posting. Over the course of 299 postings, we have explored numerous medical malpractice topics, including states’ medical malpractice laws, states’ statistics regarding medical malpractice claims, results of medical malpractice jury verdicts in various states, and relevant and timely medical information useful to our readers.

Our medical malpractice research over the last 10 months has revealed the constant assault on the rights of medical malpractice victims to receive fair and adequate compensation for their losses that has drastically, unfairly, and indiscriminately reduced the compensation received by them for their permanent, painful, and debilitating injuries and losses.

Our blog has examined the well-financed and highly-organized efforts of the health care industry promoting “tort reform” legislation drafted on its behalf by politically-connected, highly-paid lobbyists who employ public fear tactics (for example, telling patients that their doctors will need to give up their medical practices due to too high medical malpractice insurance premiums or preaching the often-recited but rarely-supported mantra about “frivolous” medical malpractice lawsuits) to wage a war that they inappropriately call ”tort reform” (“reform” implies that something was wrong to begin with). Their high-powered tactics are intended to elevate the financial interests of the very few doctors, hospitals, and other medical care providers who fail to provide the medical care that their peers have established as the bare minimum required level of medical care that should have been provided under the circumstances, over the long-established legal and moral rights of the innocent victims of negligence to be fairly and adequately compensated for their injuries and losses caused solely by the wrongdoing of others.

We have tried to bring to light the processes of certain federal agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that affect the health of our citizens, such as the federal drug-approval process that can be influenced by political considerations and the financial power held by massive drug manufacturers. We have discussed the objective findings of studies undertaken by independent federal government organizations such as the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that were relevant to medical malpractice issues, to help our readers determine for themselves the unbiased, honest information that will help them form their own opinions on medical malpractice issues relevant to their lives.

While our name, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com, and our website  are dedicated to helping the innocent victims of medical malpractice be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in their local area throughout the United States who may be able and willing to investigate their possible medical malpractice claims for them and represent them in their medical malpractice case, if appropriate, we have always provided the source of our information and the link to our source in our blogs so that our readers can read for themselves the original source information.

MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com will continue to seek out and explore interesting and useful medical malpractice information for our future blogs. If you have information or a request for information regarding medical malpractice issues important to you, please contact us with your information or your request so that we can provide the information to our blog readers.

We wish all of you the best of health, happiness, and enjoyment of life for the New Year!

Please visit our website  or call us toll free (800-295-3959) if we can assist you.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!

Nevada Medical Malpractice Verdict For Cancer Death of 27-Year-Old Mother

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

In one of the largest medical malpractice jury verdicts in Nevada during 2009, a young mother who had been complaining to her doctor for seven months that she had blood in her stools and abdominal pain beginning in 2004, died a painful death from colon and rectal cancer because her doctor misdiagnosed her condition as bleeding from hemorrhoids. If her doctor had timely and correctly diagnosed her cancer when he should have, with proper treatment she would have been expected to have a 97% survival rate.

Because her doctor failed in his responsibilities to his patient, her survival rate dropped to 50%. The late diagnosis resulted in her having to have major surgeries to remove her uterus and parts of her lower intestines. She also underwent aggressive chemotherapy but all efforts were futile; she died in 2007, leaving behind her husband and 5-year-old daughter.

The jury listened to all of the trial testimony and considered all of the evidence produced during the medical malpractice trial before returning a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $2.5 million.

Source

The misdiagnosis of cancer or the late diagnosis of cancer continue to be a substantial basis for medical malpractice claims brought against negligent health care providers throughout the United States. Because many aggressive types of cancer can result in severe debilitation or death relatively quickly, it is important that signs and symptoms of cancer be thoroughly investigated and diagnosed to provide the patient with the greatest opportunity to survive the longest period of time and with the best quality of life.

Many cancers are highly treatable or curable if timely and properly diagnosed. If a symptom could be a sign of cancer, it should be aggressively investigated because the misdiagnosis of cancer or the failed diagnosis of cancer can be devastating to the cancer patient and his/her family.

In the Nevada case, the existence of the woman’s hemorrhoids may have misled her doctor to assume that her rectal bleeding was due to that relatively benign condition as opposed to being a sign or symptom of colon or rectal cancer. Simple and prompt medical testing (such as a colonoscopy) to investigate for the source and reason for the rectal bleeding should have been done, including a biopsy of any suspicious area, if appropriate – better safe than sorry.

Visit our website or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice attorneys in your state if you suspect that you are the victim of medical malpractice.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!