Blog

Archive for the ‘Massachusetts Medical Malpractice’ Category

Massachusetts Hospitals Cited For Turning Away Emergency Room Patients

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

Within the last six months, three Massachusetts hospitals have been cited for unjustifiably turning away and failing to treat three patients who came to their emergency rooms seeking treatment. One case involved transferring a patient to another hospital while the patient was unstable and in respiratory distress.

Hospital Number One

The patient had arrived at the emergency room with shortness of breath and coughing. The patient had a long-standing serious lung condition that required that he be given oxygen. The patient requested to be transferred to another hospital where he had been treated previously.

An emergency room physician determined that the patient was stable enough to be transferred. However, a subsequent emergency room physician who took over the patient’s care failed to reassess the patient’s condition and whether the patient was stable enough to be transferred, after the patient’s condition deteriorated significantly. The emergency room staff also failed to provide the patient with a breathing tube in case he needed mechanical assistance breathing during the ambulance ride to the other hospital.

Hospital Number Two

In the second case, the patient arrived at the emergency department with a fever and pain from an abscess on the patient’s buttock. The emergency room physician determined that the patient was in poor shape and needed emergency surgery to remove the dead tissue in order to increase the patient’s chance of survival. The on-call surgeon refused to come to the hospital late at night to treat the patient. The patient had to be transferred to another hospital for treatment — the patient’s fate was not disclosed.

Hospital Number Three

In the third case, when the patient arrived at the hospital’s emergency room seeking medical treatment, the staff told the patient that he was banned from that emergency room and a sister-hospital’s emergency room. The patient was not evaluated or treated but was placed in a wheelchair and was escorted by a security guard off of the hospital’s grounds.

The patient sought treatment at another hospital emergency room. The staff of the other emergency room called the first hospital to find out why the patient had not been evaluated and treated. The first hospital arranged for an ambulance to take the patient to its sister-hospital where the patient was admitted.

A federal law, known as the anti patient dumping statute, requires hospitals with emergency rooms to provide people who arrive at their hospitals with medical screening examinations and to stabilize the patients’ emergency medical conditions. Violations of the federal law by hospitals with emergency rooms are subject to severe penalties. In New England alone, there were 11 violations of the law in 2011, 13 violations in 2010, and 7 violations in 2009.

Source

If you or a loved one have been mistreated in a hospital or subjected to negligent medical care, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries and losses. The prompt advice from a local medical malpractice attorney may help you to determine if you have a possible medical malpractice claim and to file a medical malpractice claim on your behalf, if appropriate.

Click here to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you with your possible medical malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Massachusetts Report Discusses Possible Benefits Of Medical Malpractice Reforms

Thursday, April 19th, 2012

On April 18, 2012, a coalition of seven Massachusetts hospitals, physician groups, and patient groups released a report describing their initiative to address their proposed medical malpractice reform measures in Massachusetts. Their report, entitled “A Roadmap for Removing Barriers to Disclosure, Apology and Offer in Massachusetts,” discusses their proposals that they hope will increase the reporting of medical mistakes and reduce medical malpractice litigation that adds to health care costs in Massachusetts.

The so-called “DA&O” approach (disclosure, apology, and offer) has as its goals the prompt disclosure of unanticipated medical outcomes to patients coupled with prompt investigations of claims, a system to avoid similar unanticipated outcomes in the future that would improve patient safety, apologies to patients regarding the avoidable injuries sustained by them, and a prompt and fair offer of monetary compensation to patients who suffered unintended medical outcomes without resorting to lengthy and expensive medical malpractice litigation.

As stated in “A Roadmap,” the Massachusetts initiative has four aims: “1) to identify the barriers to implementation of a DA&O model in Massachusetts, 2) to develop strategies for overcoming these barriers, 3) to design a roadmap for DA&O program implementation in this state, and 4) to assess applicability of the roadmap to other states.”

Twelve barriers were identified in “A Roadmap” with regard to implementing the DA&O approach in Massachusetts:

1. Fairness and Accountability — medical malpractice victims and medical malpractice lawyers may be suspicious of  the DA&O approach including the fear of under-compensating victims of medical malpractice, while physicians and other medical providers may have concerns regarding the legal protections (confidentiality) provided in the peer review process that examines the unintended medical outcomes in detail.

2. Physician discomfort with disclosure — doctors dislike publicly admitting their mistakes and may also have difficulty and are not trained in apologizing to their patients for unintended medical outcomes.

3. Concern for increased liability — the DA&O approach may alert patients to medical mistakes and injuries that they were unaware of, the disclosure of medical mistakes may result in medical malpractice claims that would not otherwise have been made, and patients who were injured may have heightened expectations regarding the compensation they may receive as a result of the unintended medical outcomes.

4. Physician name-based reporting — physicians fear the required reporting to the National Practitioner Data Bank of medical malpractice payouts and the potential harm to their personal/professional reputations.

5. Charitable immunity law – many hospitals and health care organizations in Massachusetts have limited financial responsibility for medical malpractice under current law and therefore fear that the DA&O approach will cost them more.

6. Difficulty coordinating insurers — if all of the defendants and their medical malpractice insurers in a medical malpractice claim do not participate in the DA&O approach, then some of them may attempt to manipulate the system to their advantage.

7. Opposition by liability insurers — medical malpractice insurance companies, like all liability insurance companies, are uncomfortable with change — they are used to and comfortable with the present medical malpractice system and the predictable costs associated with medical malpractice claims.

8. Concern that the DA&O model may not be replicable in certain settings — smaller hospitals and health care organizations, especially in rural areas, and situations where the physicians are not employed by the hospitals or the health care organizations may make it difficult and costly to fully and successfully integrate and implement a DA&O model.

9. Attorneys’ interest in maintaining the status quo — both plaintiffs’ attorneys and defendants’ attorneys have a financial interest in maintaining the present medical malpractice system, and there are concerns that the DA&O system would negatively impact patients’ rights.

10. Difficulty of getting supporting legislation passed — whenever there is a proposed change in the law, those opposing the change will make their opposition known to those who are in the position to change the law.

11. Forces of inertia — the fear of change, and those who have a stake in maintaining the medical malpractice system in its present form, will make it difficult to change to the DA&O approach.

12. Insufficient evidence that the DA&O approach works — there is little evidence from other U.S. states involving the benefits of a DA&O approach to medical malpractice claims.

One of the most discussed benefits of a DA&O approach to medical malpractice claims is the possible benefit to patient safety — including better communications between physicians and other health care providers and their patients, potentially less hostility between health care providers and their patients, and benefits associated with better and more complete reporting of unintended medical outcomes that lead to patient safety improvements and that can help avoid similar events in the future (that is, learning from one’s mistakes (and from the mistakes of others)).

Source

Whether you are a resident of Massachusetts or you live in another U.S. state, if you are the victim of possible medical negligence, you should promptly consult with a medical malpractice attorney in your state to learn about your rights.

Click here to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim for you and represent you with regard to your medical malpractice claim, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Disciplinary Statistics

Monday, February 27th, 2012

When a doctor or other medical provider commits medical malpractice and a medical malpractice claim is paid on his/her behalf, the medical malpractice payment is supposed to be officially reported and the appropriate disciplinary agency is supposed to investigate the medical malpractice claim and take the appropriate disciplinary action against the medical malpractice wrongdoer, in compliance with each state’s laws. Many states have medical boards that are charged with the task of investigating medical malpractice claims and settlements and taking appropriate disciplinary action in appropriate cases in order to “protect the public.”

A Case Study: Massachusetts

In the past ten years, a Massachusetts doctor who delivers babies has settled three medical malpractice claims made against him. Yet the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine has not disciplined the doctor.

In a recent investigation of doctor discipline in Massachusetts in which records for more than 16,000 doctors in Massachusetts were reviewed (there are about 33,000 doctors in Massachusetts), it was found that 654 doctors had settled one or more medical malpractice claims against them. Yet only six of the 654 doctors have been disciplined by the Board.

The investigation also found that in the past ten years, 14 doctors had settled three or more medical practice claims against them and yet none of them had been disciplined. The claims settled against these 14 doctors included the alleged failure to diagnose breast cancer, permanent paralysis as a result of the failure to diagnose a spine fraction, and the death of a twin baby.

On average, the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine disciplined 51 doctors per year since 2006.

Source

The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine states as its Mission Statement on its website as follows (in part):

The overriding mission of the Board is to serve the public by striving to ensure that only qualified physicians are licensed to practice in the Commonwealth, to ensure that those physicians and health care institutions in which they practice provide to their patients a high standard of care, and to support an environment that maximizes the high quality of health care in Massachusetts.

The Board investigates complaints, holds hearings and determines sanctions. These functions are critical to protecting the public by ensuring that only competent physicians and acupuncturists are practicing in Massachusetts.

Source

While it is true that a settlement payment made as a result of a medical malpractice claim is not typically accompanied by an admission that the medical provider committed medical malpractice (that is, breached the applicable standard of care), it would appear to many people that “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” – that is, a payment would not be made if there was no evidence of medical malpractice having occurred.

It is hard to believe that of the 654 doctors who made a medical malpractice settlement payment (based on a sample of more than 16,000 doctors out of a total of 33,000 doctors in Massachusetts), none of them should have been disciplined by the Board.

If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of medical malpractice in Massachusetts or in any other state in the United States, then you may want to discuss your possible medical malpractice claim with a medical malpractice attorney.

Click here to visit our website  to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim and represent you in your medical malpractice case, if appropriate.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Today’s 300th Consecutive Daily Blog Posting For MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

Today, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com is proud to celebrate its 300th consecutive daily blog posting. Over the course of 299 postings, we have explored numerous medical malpractice topics, including states’ medical malpractice laws, states’ statistics regarding medical malpractice claims, results of medical malpractice jury verdicts in various states, and relevant and timely medical information useful to our readers.

Our medical malpractice research over the last 10 months has revealed the constant assault on the rights of medical malpractice victims to receive fair and adequate compensation for their losses that has drastically, unfairly, and indiscriminately reduced the compensation received by them for their permanent, painful, and debilitating injuries and losses.

Our blog has examined the well-financed and highly-organized efforts of the health care industry promoting “tort reform” legislation drafted on its behalf by politically-connected, highly-paid lobbyists who employ public fear tactics (for example, telling patients that their doctors will need to give up their medical practices due to too high medical malpractice insurance premiums or preaching the often-recited but rarely-supported mantra about “frivolous” medical malpractice lawsuits) to wage a war that they inappropriately call ”tort reform” (“reform” implies that something was wrong to begin with). Their high-powered tactics are intended to elevate the financial interests of the very few doctors, hospitals, and other medical care providers who fail to provide the medical care that their peers have established as the bare minimum required level of medical care that should have been provided under the circumstances, over the long-established legal and moral rights of the innocent victims of negligence to be fairly and adequately compensated for their injuries and losses caused solely by the wrongdoing of others.

We have tried to bring to light the processes of certain federal agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that affect the health of our citizens, such as the federal drug-approval process that can be influenced by political considerations and the financial power held by massive drug manufacturers. We have discussed the objective findings of studies undertaken by independent federal government organizations such as the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that were relevant to medical malpractice issues, to help our readers determine for themselves the unbiased, honest information that will help them form their own opinions on medical malpractice issues relevant to their lives.

While our name, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com, and our website  are dedicated to helping the innocent victims of medical malpractice be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in their local area throughout the United States who may be able and willing to investigate their possible medical malpractice claims for them and represent them in their medical malpractice case, if appropriate, we have always provided the source of our information and the link to our source in our blogs so that our readers can read for themselves the original source information.

MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com will continue to seek out and explore interesting and useful medical malpractice information for our future blogs. If you have information or a request for information regarding medical malpractice issues important to you, please contact us with your information or your request so that we can provide the information to our blog readers.

We wish all of you the best of health, happiness, and enjoyment of life for the New Year!

Please visit our website  or call us toll free (800-295-3959) if we can assist you.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!

Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Verdict For 3-Year-Old’s Death

Saturday, December 10th, 2011

The largest medical malpractice verdict in Massachusetts during 2009 involved a 3-year-old boy who died in December, 2004, unable to walk or speak since he underwent a cardiac catherization 18 months earlier. It was alleged that the doctors at a Massachusetts hospital injected too much contrast dye and used too much anesthesia that contributed to his death.

The boy was born in July, 2001 with a serious birth defect that affected the flow of blood through his heart and required that he have seven cardiac catherizations by the age of two. Hours after his last cardiac catherization on April 18, 2003 (his second at the Massachusetts hospital), the little boy suffered a seizure. A CT scan after the procedure found that the contrast dye had leaked into his brain. A MRI after the seizure also found a small piece of metal lodged in his brain, allegedly from a medical instrument used during the procedure (the medical malpractice claim involving the medical instrument manufacturer and the medical malpractice claim against the contrast dye manufacturer were settled before the trial against the doctors). Unfortunately, the boy had suffered severe brain damage by the time of his discharge from the hospital three weeks later.

Another important issue during the medical malpractice trial against the doctors involved the alleged alteration of the boy’s medical records. It was alleged that the treating physicians tried to cover up their medical mistakes when someone signed off on a medical record despite not being present during the treatment and when the medical note from a cardiologist in the intensive care unit disappeared (the doctors denied the allegations). Apparent inconsistencies in the medical records, and differences between the electronic medical records and the printed medical records, were also a focus during the medical malpractice trial.

The medical malpractice jury trial lasted six weeks after which the jury deliberated for five days before rendering their verdict in December, 2009, finding as follows: $5 million for the boy’s pain and suffering, $5 million for the parents’ loss of their child, and $5 million for wrongful death.

Source

Allegations of altered medical records, especially when they involve the medical records of a child who allegedly died as a result of medical mistakes, are serious. Doctors and other treating medical providers have access and control over the patient’s medical records and the patient has no say or input in what appears (or does not appear) in the patient’s medical records. Often medical malpractice juries rely on what is stated in the medical records; if the jurors believe that the medical records were intentionally altered, they will react accordingly.

If you or a family member are the victim of possible medical malpractice, it is important to promptly obtain professional legal advice regarding your medical malpractice claim to reduce the possibility of altered medical records and to protect your right to compensation for your losses.

Visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim and bring a medical malpractice case on your behalf, if appropriate. You may also reach us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!