Blog
Archive for the ‘Florida Medical Malpractice’ Category
Monday, April 2nd, 2012
In October, 2011, a 15-year-old mother brought her then 3-month-old daughter to a local Florida hospital when her daughter spiked a fever and had bronchitis. The little girl was hospitalized for three days for treatment of her medical condition. An IV that had been placed in her hand for medical treatment purposes had to be removed before she could be discharged.
As the mother held her infant daughter on her lap, the nurse who was assigned the duty to remove the IV line began to cut the bandage on the infant’s left hand that secured the IV tube when the mother heard her daughter begin to scream and cry, noticed a great deal of blood on both her and her daughter, and saw that the end of her daughter’s pinkie had been negligently severed by the nurse. The nurse called for the doctors who found the severed pinkie on the floor and had the infant transferred to another hospital for treatment. Unfortunately, the doctors were unable to reattach the portion of the infant’s severed pinkie because the nerve endings were too small.
The family of the infant girl hired a medical malpractice attorney to attempt to negotiate a settlement with the original hospital. The medical malpractice attorney contacted the hospital but allegedly the hospital failed to respond in a timely fashion. When settlement negotiations failed to resolve the medical malpractice claim, the family’s medical malpractice attorney recently filed a medical malpractice lawsuit on the family’s behalf.
Source
It would seem pretty clear that the nurse who inadvertently cut and severed the tip of the infant girl’s left pinkie was careless in performing the simple medical procedure of cutting a bandage that was securing an IV line. It is not clear at this time why the injury occurred; it may have been due to negligent training by the hospital and/or the negligent performance of the task by the nurse.
In any event, the now 8-month-old infant will live with the visible effects of her injury for the rest of her life. And her mother is suffering from the emotional trauma that evidently resulted in nightmares and other manifestations of mental anguish. A medical malpractice jury may ultimately have to decide the value of the infant’s and her mother’s losses if the parties to the medical malpractice lawsuit cannot resolve the claims.
If you or a loved one suffered losses due to medical malpractice that occurred in a hospital, in a doctor’s office, in a medical clinic, or elsewhere, you may be entitled to monetary compensation for your losses. A prompt consultation with a local medical malpractice lawyer may assist you in finding out if you have a valid medical malpractice claim and learning about your legal rights and responsibilities regarding you medical malpractice claim.
Click here to visit our website or call us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be willing and able to bring a medical malpractice claim on your behalf.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: Florida medical malpractice, Florida medical malpractice attorneys, Florida medical malpractice claims, Florida medical malpractice lawyers, hospital malpractice, hospital medical malpractice, hospital negligence, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice cases, medical malpractice claim, medical malpractice lawsuit, medical malpractice lawyers, medical negligence, medical negligence claims
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Hospital Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Claims, Medical Malpractice Facts, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Victim, Medical Negligence, Medical News | No Comments »
Friday, March 30th, 2012
Back in 2007, a Florida medical malpractice jury awarded almost $31 million to a child and his parents for the child’s birth injuries that included cerebral palsy and other serious injuries that the jury determined were the result of medical malpractice committed by employees of Lee Memorial Health System in Southwest Florida. As a result of the medical malpractice negligence, the child (who is now 14 years old and lives with his mother in Colorado) needs around-the-clock physical care but is able to communicate by using a computer.
Lee Memorial was not required to pay the judgment at the time of the medical malpractice jury’s verdict due to sovereign immunity laws in Florida. Furthermore, Lee Memorial Health System did not have insurance coverage that would cover the verdict against it. Nonetheless, the medical malpractice claimants and their attorneys pursued legislation in Florida to obtain compensation that would be fair to the child and his family.
On March 5, 2012, the Florida House considered and passed House Bill 965 that would require Lee Memorial to pay $15 million of the medical malpractice jury verdict. On March 7, 2012, the Florida Senate considered House Bill 965 and passed it by a vote of 32 to 4. The legislation now goes to Governor Rick Scott for his consideration. The $15 million would be paid over time: $10 million by the end of 2012 and $1 million per year for five years thereafter.
Critics of the legislation include Lee Memorial Health System that argued that the money it would have to pay to the child and his parents is money that would otherwise be used to provide necessary health care to other children. An attempt in the Florida Senate by senators from Southwest Florida (where Lee Memorial Health System operates) to reduce the $15 million payment to $7.25 million was defeated in the Florida Senate.
Source
We applaud the Florida Legislature in its efforts to right a wrong — the medical malpractice jury considered all of the evidence and testimony in a fair trial before determining that the medical malpractice negligence of the employees of Lee Memorial Health System was responsible for the child’s severe and permanent injuries and that the sum of nearly $31 million would be fair compensation for the child’s life-long injuries and his parents’ losses. Since Lee Memorial Health System chose to be uninsured for the negligence of its employees at the time of the child’s injuries, it has no valid reason to complain that it is being told to accept the less-than-one-half of its established financial responsibility to the child and his parents.
If you have become the victim of a hospital’s medical malpractice or other medical provider’s medical negligence, you should promptly consult with a medical malpractice attorney to learn about your possible right to compensation for your injuries and losses.
Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to assist you with your medical malpractice claim. Or you may call us toll free at 800-295-3959.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: Florida medical malpractice, Florida medical malpractice attorneys, Florida medical malpractice claims, Florida medical malpractice lawyers, hospital claims, hospital malpractice, hospital medical malpractice, medical errors, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice cases, medical malpractice claims, medical malpractice lawyers, medical mistakes, medical negligence
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Claims, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Verdict, Medical Malpractice Victim, Medical Negligence, Medical News | No Comments »
Saturday, February 18th, 2012
The Republican-led Florida Legislature is considering amendments to Florida’s medical malpractice law to make it more difficult for victims of medical malpractice to win their medical malpractice cases and would also allow medical malpractice defendants’ lawyers to speak with the victims’ doctors one-on-one and without their patients’ permission.
Proposed Stricter Burden Of Proof For Medical Malpractice Victims
A proposed change in the law would substantially raise the level of proof that medical malpractice victims must meet in order to recover damages for their injuries if due to the alleged failure to order supplemental diagnostic medical tests. The proposed change reads as follows: In an action for damages based on death or personal injury which alleges that such death or injury resulted from the failure of a health care provider to order, perform, or administer supplemental diagnostic tests, the claimant has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged actions of the health care provider represented a breach of the prevailing professional standard of care. Source
The Florida Supreme Court defines the proposed standard of proof known as “clear and convincing evidence” as “evidence that is precise, explicit, lacking in confusion, and of such weight that it produces a firm belief or conviction, without hesitation, about the issue.“ Florida Standard Jury Instructions — Civil Cases, Standard Instruction 405.4.
The existing standard of proof in Florida medical malpractice cases is known as “greater weight of the evidence” which the Florida Supreme Court has defined as evidence that has “the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case.” Florida Standard Jury Instructions — Civil Cases, Standard Instruction 405.3.
Obviously, the proposed stricter requirement for proof by evidence that is “precise, explicit…that it produces a firm belief or conviction” is a much higher burden than evidence that is “more persuasive.” If the proposed change becomes the medical malpractice law in Florida, it will be much more difficult for Florida medical malpractice victims to recover for their injuries resulting from medical malpractice committed by Florida doctors when the basis of the medical malpractice claim is the negligent failure of the doctor to order and obtain supplemental diagnostic tests, such as mammograms in failure to diagnose breast cancer cases.
Proposed Change: No Patient-Doctor Confidentiality For Medical Malpractice Victims
The other significant, major proposed change to Florida’s medical malpractice law would allow the attorneys for medical malpractice defendants and the medical malpractice defendants themselves to meet alone in private with all of the treating doctors of medical malpractice victims, without any restrictions whatsoever.
The proposed change in the law reads as follows: “A prospective defendant or his or her legal representative may interview the claimant’s treating health care providers without the presence of the claimant or the claimant’s legal representative.” Source
The proposed change in the law does not limit the extent or the subject matter of the discussions between the medical malpractice defendants, their attorneys, and the medical malpractice victims’ doctors; the proposed change in the law does not limit the extent or the subject of the disclosures by the victims’ treating doctors; and, the proposed change in the law does not restrict the doctors who would be violating the previously sacrosanct patient-doctor confidentiality to only those who treated the medical malpractice victims for the injuries caused by the alleged negligent care.
As the proposed change to the law is written, what would limit the defendants’ attorneys from discussing the sexual history of a medical malpractice victim with the victim’s treating gynecologist in a medical malpractice claim involving the failure to diagnose breast cancer in a timely fashion, or from discussing the results of their findings with others such as health insurance companies, sexual partners or family members of the medical malpractice victims, the medical malpractice defendants themselves, or anyone and everyone in the defendants’ attorneys’ law firms?
The nation’s laws are supposed to protect victims, not victimize them further. As we see it, the proposed changes to Florida’s medical malpractice laws would unfairly, inequitably, and unjustly protect and benefit a special class of people (medical malpractice defendants) at the expense of the enormous harm and detriment to innocent victims of medical malpractice.
If you or a loved one were injured or suffered serious losses as a result of medical malpractice in Florida or in any other U.S. state, click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to assist you with your medical malpractice claim. You may also reach us at our toll free number 800-295-3959.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: changes to Florida medical malpractice law, clear and convincing evidence, Florida medical malpractice, Florida medical malpractice attorneys, Florida medical malpractice cases, Florida medical malpractice claims, Florida medical malpractice law, Florida medical malpractice lawyers, greater weight of the evidence, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice cases, medical malpractice claims, medical malpractice lawyers, medical malpractice tort reform, medical negligence, Proposed Changes To Florida's Medical Malpractice Law Harms Malpractice Victims, tort reform
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Facts, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Reforms, Medical News, Uncategorized | No Comments »
Monday, January 30th, 2012
At the time of a Florida teenager’s birth, severe intestinal problems required that her spleen and other organs be removed. As a result of not having a spleen, the teenager was more susceptible to bacterial and viral infections that required her to take medication to prevent infections. Her mother was responsible to make sure that her child took the necessary medication.
What Is The Spleen And What Does It Do?
The spleen is a fist-sized organ above the stomach on the left side under the ribs. The spleen is part of the lymphatic system that contains white blood cells that fight infections. The spleen also keeps the body’s fluids in balance and assists the body to control the blood supply by destroying worn out and old cells. A person can live without a spleen but will be more susceptible to infections. People without spleens may need to take medication to prevent infections, especially children who may need to take antibiotics.
What Happened To The Florida Child?
In 1998, the child’s mother brought her to a medical school pediatric clinic where the child was vaccinated by a medical assistant with a special vaccine for people who do not have spleens. The particular vaccination that was given to the child had expired five months prior to it being administered to the child.
Eight months later, the child acquired a bacterial infection that caused blood clots to form in her legs and arms. Gangrene set in that required all four of the child’s limbs to be amputated. A medical malpractice case was filed and took ten years to come to trial.
Earlier this month, after a five-week trial and three days of jury deliberations, the medical malpractice jury found in favor of the child and awarded $12.6 million. The amount of the verdict will be reduced by 40%, which is the percentage by which the jury determined that the mother was responsible for her daughter’s injuries (the allegation was that the mother failed to give her daughter enough medication to prevent her bacterial infection that led to her amputations, despite having been given an expired vaccine).
It is anticipated that the medical malpractice defendants will appeal the verdict.
Source
Vaccines have expiration dates because they lose potency and their ability to prevent the conditions that they are designed to prevent over time. An expired vaccine given to a patient is a danger to that patient — there is no way that the patient will know that the vaccine received had expired. Vaccines that are not properly stored or handled improperly are also a risk to patients.
If you or a family member suffered serious medical consequences as a result of a bad vaccine, you or your family member may be entitled to compensation for your losses. Local medical malpractice attorneys may be able to assist you in receiving the compensation that you deserve.
Click here to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with local medical malpractice lawyers who may be able to assist you with your possible medical malpractice claim.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: bad vaccine, expired vaccine, Florida medical malpractice, Florida medical malpractice attorneys, Florida medical malpractice cases, Florida medical malpractice claims, Florida medical malpractice lawyers, Florida Medical Malpractice Verdict For Teen Who Lost All Four Limbs, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice case, medical malpractice claim, medical malpractice lawyers, vaccine death, vaccine error, vaccine injuries, vaccine malpractice, vaccine mistake
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Claims, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Verdict, Medical Malpractice Victim, Medical Negligence, Medical News | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 24th, 2012
On Friday, January 20, 2012, a Florida jury awarded $168 million in compensatory damages in a medical malpractice case; on Monday, January 23, 2012, the same medical malpractice jury awarded another $10 million in punitive damages. The medical malpractice claim involved an obese deputy’s laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in 2007 that resulted in severe complications that allegedly were improperly and untimely diagnosed and treated, resulting in the man suffering cardiac arrest and septic shock that caused him to sustain brain damage. The deputy was in a coma for more than two weeks. Presently, his speech is affected and he is unable to walk or take care of his activituies of daily living on his own.
The medical malpractice defendants were the man’s gastric bypass surgeon and the hospital where the gastric bypass surgery was performed. The medical malpractice allegations included claims for medical negligence and for fraud. The fraud allegation involved the hospital’s alleged failures with regard to the competence of the gastric bypass surgeon and the hospital’s representations regarding its ability to provide the services that the deputy required. The medical malpractice jury determined that the hospital was 60% at fault and that the surgeon was 40% at fault.
The hospital said in a statement after the medical malpractice verdict that it disagreed with the jury’s verdict and planned to file an appeal.
Source
Some people may scoff at patients who undergo gastric bypass surgery, believing that obese patients are “weak” because they should have control over their weight. Some may believe that obesity is a symptom of the lack of self-control that is a character flaw of overweight people. Nonetheless, these people would be wrong in their judgments in most cases. The fact is that many people who suffer from obesity are sentenced to life-long ridicule and/or discrimination due to their large size.
Obesity in the United States is a recognized disease that has been identified as a national epidemic by many experts. The growing prevalence of obesity in our young children is a problem that will cost our country much in lost wealth and productivity if the obesity problem is not promptly and properly addressed.
There are treatment options available for severe obesity, including gastric bypass surgery that makes changes to the digestive tract by limiting the amount of food that can be eaten and/or by reducing the amount of nutrients that can be absorbed. Gastric bypass surgery is just one type of bariatric surgery available to control weight when diet and exercise alone are not enough to lose the desired amount of weight. Once the procedure is completed, the patient must make permanent changes to diet and engage in regular exercise for the success of the surgery in the long term. As with all major surgery, there are known risks and complications associated with gastric bypass surgery.
If a patient experiences a known risk or complication from gastric bypass surgery, an unnecessary delay in diagnosing the complication or the failure to timely and appropriately respond to the complication may be the basis for a medical malpractice claim.
If you suffered a complication from gastric bypass surgery or any other surgery, the assistance of a medical malpractice attorney may help you determine if you have the basis for filing a medical malpractice claim. Click here to visit our website or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your local area who may be able to assist you in investigating your possible medical malpractice claim.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: bad surgery, Florida medical malpractice, Florida medical malpractice attorneys, Florida medical malpractice claims, Florida medical malpractice lawyers, gastric bypass surgery, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice case, medical malpractice claim, medical malpractice lawyers, medical malpractice verdict, medical negligence, negligent surgeon, negligent surgery
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Claims, Medical Malpractice Facts, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Verdict, Medical Malpractice Victim, Medical Negligence, Medical News | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 10th, 2012
A 79-year-old dialysis patient in Florida experienced shortness of breath after a dialysis session. He was admitted into the intensive care unit of a local hospital for treatment. The next day, he was administered the wrong medication that resulted in his death, according to the allegations in the medical malpractice case filed against the hospital where the alleged medical negligence occurred.
What Happened?
While the man was being treated in the hospital’s intensive care unit, he complained of an upset stomach. His doctor ordered an antacid but the man was given pancuronium instead (Pancuronium is a very powerful muscle relaxant and paralytic that is often used during intubation of patients and is commonly used during surgery. It becomes effective within 90 to 120 seconds after it is administered. Full muscle paralysis is achieved within 2 to 4 minutes and the clinical effects last for a little over one and a half hours. Full recovery after a single dose is about two to three hours in healthy adults. It is the second of the three drugs used during lethal injections of prisoners in the United States.)
Thirty minutes after being given the wrong medication, the Florida man was found unresponsive. His medical providers were able to resuscitate him but not before he sustained irreversible brain damage. He died about one month later.
Source
Hospital personnel are trained to use the utmost care in administering prescribed drugs to patients. Nurses (or other medical providers who administer medications to patients) are trained to verbally confirm with each patient the patient’s name and date of birth and then compare that information with the medication order to insure that the proper patient is receiving the proper medication. The labeling information on the medication (such as the name of the drug and the dosage of the medication stated on the drug packaging) is visually confirmed with the medication order to insure that the proper medication, and the proper dosage of the medication, is being administered as ordered by the doctor.
Many hospitals now use hand-held scanners that read the patient’s hospital chart information (including drug orders contained in bar coded information placed in the patient’s hospital chart) and then read and confirm the patient’s identification information that is typically contained in a bar code placed in a wrist band worn by the patient. The use of scanners and bar codes may help to reduce the incidents of wrong medications being given to the wrong patients in hospitals but human care givers are required to remain highly vigilant in administering medications to hospital patients.
In the Florida man’s case, the medical malpractice claim alleges that an investigative report determined that the nurse “failed to look and read what medication he was taking…failed to scan to determine the right count for the medication, failed to match the patient’s ID with the scanned medication.”
We’re All Just One Pill Away From Death
The Florida man’s alleged negligent hospital care, and similar cases from around the country, should scare the daylights out of everybody. As this and other medical malpractice cases illustrate, a moment’s lapse in attention to detail or careless conduct can turn deadly fast. Drugs, when used in the manner as prescribed and in the dosage as prescribed, can save lives; the same drugs, when used inappropriately or in the wrong dosage, can lead to death or permanent injuries.
If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of the wrong drug or the wrong dosage of a drug, you should consult with a medical malpractice attorney to learn about your legal rights.
Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able and willing to investigate your possible medical malpractice claim for you and file a medical malpractice case on your behalf, if appropriate. If you prefer, you may telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: Florida medical malpractice, Florida medical malpractice attorneys, Florida medical malpractice case, Florida Medical Malpractice Claim For Death Due To Wrong Medication, Florida medical malpractice claims, Florida medical malpractice lawyers, hospital error, hospital malpractice, hospital medical malpractice, hospital mistake, hospital negligence, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice claim, medical malpractice lawyers, negligent hospital care, wrong drug, wrong drug dosage
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Claims, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Victim, Medical Negligence, Medical News | No Comments »
Thursday, December 29th, 2011
Today, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com is proud to celebrate its 300th consecutive daily blog posting. Over the course of 299 postings, we have explored numerous medical malpractice topics, including states’ medical malpractice laws, states’ statistics regarding medical malpractice claims, results of medical malpractice jury verdicts in various states, and relevant and timely medical information useful to our readers.
Our medical malpractice research over the last 10 months has revealed the constant assault on the rights of medical malpractice victims to receive fair and adequate compensation for their losses that has drastically, unfairly, and indiscriminately reduced the compensation received by them for their permanent, painful, and debilitating injuries and losses.
Our blog has examined the well-financed and highly-organized efforts of the health care industry promoting “tort reform” legislation drafted on its behalf by politically-connected, highly-paid lobbyists who employ public fear tactics (for example, telling patients that their doctors will need to give up their medical practices due to too high medical malpractice insurance premiums or preaching the often-recited but rarely-supported mantra about “frivolous” medical malpractice lawsuits) to wage a war that they inappropriately call ”tort reform” (“reform” implies that something was wrong to begin with). Their high-powered tactics are intended to elevate the financial interests of the very few doctors, hospitals, and other medical care providers who fail to provide the medical care that their peers have established as the bare minimum required level of medical care that should have been provided under the circumstances, over the long-established legal and moral rights of the innocent victims of negligence to be fairly and adequately compensated for their injuries and losses caused solely by the wrongdoing of others.
We have tried to bring to light the processes of certain federal agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that affect the health of our citizens, such as the federal drug-approval process that can be influenced by political considerations and the financial power held by massive drug manufacturers. We have discussed the objective findings of studies undertaken by independent federal government organizations such as the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that were relevant to medical malpractice issues, to help our readers determine for themselves the unbiased, honest information that will help them form their own opinions on medical malpractice issues relevant to their lives.
While our name, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com, and our website are dedicated to helping the innocent victims of medical malpractice be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in their local area throughout the United States who may be able and willing to investigate their possible medical malpractice claims for them and represent them in their medical malpractice case, if appropriate, we have always provided the source of our information and the link to our source in our blogs so that our readers can read for themselves the original source information.
MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com will continue to seek out and explore interesting and useful medical malpractice information for our future blogs. If you have information or a request for information regarding medical malpractice issues important to you, please contact us with your information or your request so that we can provide the information to our blog readers.
We wish all of you the best of health, happiness, and enjoyment of life for the New Year!
Please visit our website or call us toll free (800-295-3959) if we can assist you.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: malpractice, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice blog, medical malpractice cases, medical malpractice claims, medical malpractice issues, medical malpractice lawyers, medical malpractice reform, medical malpractice victims, medical negligence, medicalmalpracticelawyers.com, Today's 300th Consecutive Daily Blog Posting For MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com, tort reform
Posted in Alabama Medical Malpractice, Alaska Medical Malpractice, California Medical Malpractice, Chicago Medical Malpractice, Client Updates, Drug Shortage, Florida Medical Malpractice, Illinois Medical Malpractice, Indiana Medical Malpractice, Is it Medical Malpractice?, Kansas Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Louisiana Medical Malpractice, Maine Medical Malpractice, Maryland Medical Malpractice, Massachusetts Medical Malpractice, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Claims, Medical Malpractice Facts, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Reforms, Medical Malpractice Statistics, Medical Malpractice Verdict, Medical Malpractice Victim, Medical Negligence, Medical Testing, Michigan Medical Malpractice, Nebraska Medical Malpractice, Nevada Medical Malpractice, New Jersey Medical Malpractice, New Mexico Medical Malpractice, North Carolina Medical Malpractice, North Dakota Medical Malpractice, Nursing Home Medical Malpractice, Nursing Medical Malpractice, Oregon Medical Malpractice, Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice, Politicians and Their Views on Medical Malpractice, South Carolina Medical Malpractice, Tennessee Medical Malpractice, Texas Medical Malpractice, Thanksgiving, Tort Reforms, Utah Medical Malptractice, Vermont Medical Malpractice, Virginia Medical Malpractice, West Virginia Medical Malpractice, Wisconsin Medical Malpractice, Wyoming Medical Malpractice | No Comments »
Wednesday, December 28th, 2011
When states enact so-called “medical malpractice reforms” (also known as “tort reforms”) such as caps (limits) on non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering, mental anguish, and disfigurement) that victims of medical malpractice may recover despite a jury’s determination and verdict in excess of the cap, there may be questions as to when the reforms apply and/or how the reforms apply.
Florida recently grappled with this issue in a case involving a medical malpractice claim for the permanent damage to a man’s heart due to the alleged medical mistakes by his medical care providers who failed to give the man the anti-clotting drug Retavase during his heart attack in April, 2003 (three months before Florida’s cap on non-economic damages became effective). The medical malpractice case involving the man’s alleged negligent care was filed two years later, after the non-economic damages cap became effective.
In addressing the issue of the effective date of the Florida non-economic damages cap, the Florida Supreme Court determined that the date of the alleged medical malpractice injury was the relevant date in determining if the Florida cap on non-economic damages applied, not the date that the medical malpractice case was filed. The Florida Supreme Court reasoned that the Florida Legislature could not make the change in the law retroactive because making it retroactive would be unjust.
As a result, the verdict rendered by the jury in the Florida man’s case in the amount of $10.3 million would not be reduced to less than $1 million, which would be the amount allowable if the cap applied to his medical malpractice case. (Unfortunately for the man’s surviving wife, the defendant emergency room physician only had a $1 million medical malpractice policy limit.)
Source
Caps on non-economic damages awarded by medical malpractice juries in many states are a much debated topic. Doctors and their ilk argue that caps are necessary to keep medical costs down and to keep doctors from leaving their medical practices due to high medical malpractice insurance premiums. Victims of medical malpractice, their families, and their lawyers often argue that caps unfairly (and unconstitutionally) place artificial limits on jury awards that violate the sanctity of the jury’s verdict (juries are most often not told about caps or the amount of the caps — the caps (reductions), when applicable, are applied by a judge after the jury renders its verdict, and the medical care providers whose negligence has been found to have caused the plaintiff to be injured are not responsible to pay any amount for non-economic damages above the cap (it’s as if the jury never determined and awarded an amount above the cap as fair and adequate compensation for the non-economic damages suffered by the plaintiff)).
We, at MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com, believe in the ageless value and constitutional right of having an unbiased and local jury selected by the parties to a medical malpractice lawsuit listen to all of the trial testimony, evaluate the trial evidence, and consider the arguments of the parties’ lawyers before retiring to deliberate the claims of the various parties and to come to a verdict that comports with the facts and evidence in the case and the applicable law. When state legislatures disrespect the constitutional right of the parties to have their jury render its opinion and decision and refuse to give the jury’s verdict full force and effect by imposing arbitrary caps on allowable damages, then we have lost an important constitutional right hewn from hundreds of years of worldly experience and near-universal agreement that a jury of one’s peers is the best and ultimate unbiased decider of our fate.
If you or a loved one have become the victim of medical malpractice, the timely advice of a medical malpractice attorney is critical to protecting and preserving your rights. Click here to visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to help you with your medical malpractice claim or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: Florida cap on damages, Florida medical malpractice, Florida medical malpractice attorneys, Florida medical malpractice lawyers, malpractice tort reform, medical malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, medical malpractice case, medical malpractice claim, medical malpractice insurance, medical malpractice lawsuit, medical malpractice lawyers, medical malpractice tort reform, medical mistakes, medical negligence, tort reform
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Claims, Medical Malpractice Facts, Medical Malpractice Lawyers, Medical Malpractice Reforms, Medical Malpractice Victim, Medical Negligence, Tort Reforms, Uncategorized | No Comments »
Monday, November 28th, 2011
A concerned 17-year-old Florida mother brought her 3-month-old infant son to a local hospital emergency room in Florida because he had been vomiting and had diarrhea for three days. She and her son were in the emergency department for four and a half hours before she was told that it was safe for her to bring her son home.
Early the next morning, less than six hours after leaving the emergency room, , her infant son had difficulty breathing and had to be rushed back to the same hospital emergency room. In the emergency room, the infant was noted to suffer seizures and stopped breathing. The doctors were able to revive the infant in the emergency room, but unfortunately he had suffered irreversible brain damage due to extreme dehydration that was the cause of his seizures and breathing problems.
By the age of nine, when the resulting medical malpractice case came before a jury for trial, the boy’s mental capacity was such that he needed help in dressing himself, he was two full grades behind in school, and he was still attempting to learn the alphabet. It was doubtful that he would ever graduate from high school or be able to find and hold a job.
Source
The jury found that the hospital and a doctor negligently failed to check the infant for dehydration during the first hospital emergency room visit and failed to properly treat the infant’s dehydration. With a history of several days of vomiting and diarrhea, the risk of dehydration was a known and potentially serious medical condition that should have been investigated and treated by the hospital and the doctor during the first visit. Dehydration, especially in infants such as a 3-month-old, requires prompt diagnosis as well as prompt and appropriate medical treatment. If not treated in time, dehydration can lead to brain damage and even death.
The jury determined that the hospital was 60% responsible for the boy’s brain damage and that a doctor was 40% at fault. The hospital disagreed with the jury’s decision (the doctor had settled before the trial).
Source
What was once a happy and health 3-month-old developed into a permanently brain damaged adolescent with limited mental capacity and with the prospect of life-long challenges and disappointments. One can only imagine the emotional trauma suffered by the 17-year-old mother when advised about her son’s permanent limitations. The cause of this tragedy was the medical negligence of the hospital and a doctor, as determined by the jury — with proper and timely treatment at the time of the first emergency room visit, this boy’s future could have been bright and spectacular. Instead, two lives have been ruined — the boy’s and his mother’s.
The medical care provided by hospitals is only as good as the people who provide that care. If a hospital or its staff has caused you or a loved one to be seriously injured, you may have the basis for a medical malpractice claim. Visit our website to be connected with local medical malpractice lawyers who may be willing to review your possible medical malpractice claim and represent you, if appropriate. You may also reach us toll free at 800-295-3959.
Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.
You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!
Tags: dehydration, doctor negligence, hospital claim, hospital injury, hospital malpractice, hospital medical malpractice, hospital negligence, malpractice attorney, malpractice claim, medical malpractice, medical malpractice claim, medical malpractice lawyer
Posted in Client Updates, Florida Medical Malpractice, Lawyer Updates, Medical Malpractice Case, Medical Malpractice Lawyers | No Comments »