Blog

Archive for the ‘Chicago Medical Malpractice’ Category

Chicago Medical Malpractice Results In Elderly Man Freezing To Death

Tuesday, February 14th, 2012

The 77-year-old male resident of a Chicago nursing home had a habit of wandering off from the premises. With a history of two previous recent incidents when he had wandered away, he was a known risk for leaving the nursing home without being seen. The man’s dementia made it difficult for him to understand that he should not leave the nursing home. His heart condition made it dangerous if he left. And the freezing temperatures in Chicago during January made it deadly if the man were to walk outside and disappear from the nursing home.

On January 14, 2012, the man left his nursing home without being observed. He was not found until two days later when his body was discovered partially submerged in a creek one block from the nursing home. He had died from exposure (hypothermia).

The nurse responsible for the man’s care claims that she was unaware that the man had attempted to leave the nursing home on prior occasions and that the care plan for the man did not document the prior wandering attempts. Nonetheless, the man was not fitted with a device that would have warned the nursing home staff on duty if the man attempted to wander off.

Source

What Is A “Care Plan”?

Nursing homes are required to establish a written care plan that outlines the medical (nursing) care that is to be provided to each resident. Every patient must undergo a detailed assessment that forms the basis in determining a plan of action required to address the patient’s identified problems and issues and to work towards identified patient goals and objectives. The care plan is an on-going process that is required to be updated and changed as the patient’s condition/problems/issues change over time.

Nurses and aides who take care of nursing home patients must refer to and depend upon the care plan to insure that the proper nursing care is being provided to their assigned patients. If the care plan for a patient fails to adequately outline the patient’s problems, or is not timely and properly updated to address changes in the patient’s needs and medical conditions, the appropriate care may not be provided because the caregivers may be unaware of certain problems or issues with the patient.

Failure to timely and appropriately create the care plan and/or to make changes to the care plan when required is a breach of the standard of care and is, by definition, medical malpractice. Failure to follow the care plan, without adequate reason, is also medical malpractice. Deviation from the care plan can result in devastating injuries, or death, to the patient who is the subject of the care plan.

In the case of the Chicago nursing home resident, if the man was not properly assessed for wandering, or his care plan was not properly written or updated to address his recent wandering and to set forth nursing interventions to address his wandering (including but not necessarily fitting the man with a device that sets off an alarm if and when he attempts to leave the premises), then the nursing home may be responsible for the medical negligence that resulted in the man’s death.

If you or a loved one were injured due to nursing home negligence, the advice of a medical malpractice attorney may help you decide if you should bring a medical malpractice claim for your losses.

Click here to visit our website  or telephone us toll free at 800-295-3959 to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you in investigating your possible medical malpractice claim.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and LinkedIn as well!

Chicago Medical Malpractice Settlement For Radiation Overdose Death

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

The beneficial use of radiation in medical diagnostic testing (such as x-rays) and medical treatment of certain diseases and conditions (such as various forms and types of cancer) has helped many patients receive the best available medical care and treatment. However, the medical equipment that use radiation sources must be maintained and calibrated as recommended by the equipment manufacturers and according to nationally-recognized standards, and the operators of the equipment must be properly trained.

The medical equipment that use radiation must also be properly calibrated for each patient and each treatment as ordered by the prescribing medical provider and pursuant to established protocols. Malfunctioning or improperly adjusted medical equipment, or improperly protected patients, may result in serious injuries or death to those exposed to too much radiation or to radiation to unintended body areas. Just like a bell that cannot be un-rung, once radiation is released into a patient, the potential damage to tissues, organs, and cells has already begun and may not manifest in injury or obvious damage until later in life.

In March, 2003, a 60-year-old woman began radiation treatment at a Chicago-area hospital for Stage III endometrial cancer. According to a medical malpractice claim filed on behalf of the woman’s surviving husband and two adult children, the woman received fifty percent more radiation than prescribed for her during the course of seventeen radiation treatments. The medical malpractice claim alleged that the excess radiation caused her to develop a perforated bowel that caused her to become septic and led to her death in May, 2004. The medical malpractice case settled for $7.5 million.

Source

Overuse of medical radiation is not a recent problem. Three years ago, there was an investigation into the alleged over-radiation of premature babies at a New York hospital. Even after the investigation, problems of over-radiation allegedly continued.

In another case of alleged misuse of radiation in medical treatment, a breast cancer patient was over-radiated for 27 days in a row and died after developing a large radiation burn.

It was reported in 2009 that more than 300 patients at a large, well-known Los Angeles hospital were subjected to over-radiation in CT scanners (about 260 of the patients received eight times the normal dose of radiation). The problem continued for 18 months until it was recognized that patients suffered patterns of hair loss indicative of the problem.

The overuse of x-rays in dental offices, especially in children, is also a concern.

Source

If you suspect or know that you have received more radiation during medical diagnostic testing or medical treatment than you should have received, you may be entitled to medical monitoring and/or monetary compensation. The prompt advice of a medical malpractice attorney is essential to protect your rights.

Visit our website  to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to help you file a medical malpractice claim for your injuries, or call us toll free at 800-295-3959.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!

Today’s 300th Consecutive Daily Blog Posting For MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

Today, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com is proud to celebrate its 300th consecutive daily blog posting. Over the course of 299 postings, we have explored numerous medical malpractice topics, including states’ medical malpractice laws, states’ statistics regarding medical malpractice claims, results of medical malpractice jury verdicts in various states, and relevant and timely medical information useful to our readers.

Our medical malpractice research over the last 10 months has revealed the constant assault on the rights of medical malpractice victims to receive fair and adequate compensation for their losses that has drastically, unfairly, and indiscriminately reduced the compensation received by them for their permanent, painful, and debilitating injuries and losses.

Our blog has examined the well-financed and highly-organized efforts of the health care industry promoting “tort reform” legislation drafted on its behalf by politically-connected, highly-paid lobbyists who employ public fear tactics (for example, telling patients that their doctors will need to give up their medical practices due to too high medical malpractice insurance premiums or preaching the often-recited but rarely-supported mantra about “frivolous” medical malpractice lawsuits) to wage a war that they inappropriately call ”tort reform” (“reform” implies that something was wrong to begin with). Their high-powered tactics are intended to elevate the financial interests of the very few doctors, hospitals, and other medical care providers who fail to provide the medical care that their peers have established as the bare minimum required level of medical care that should have been provided under the circumstances, over the long-established legal and moral rights of the innocent victims of negligence to be fairly and adequately compensated for their injuries and losses caused solely by the wrongdoing of others.

We have tried to bring to light the processes of certain federal agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that affect the health of our citizens, such as the federal drug-approval process that can be influenced by political considerations and the financial power held by massive drug manufacturers. We have discussed the objective findings of studies undertaken by independent federal government organizations such as the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that were relevant to medical malpractice issues, to help our readers determine for themselves the unbiased, honest information that will help them form their own opinions on medical malpractice issues relevant to their lives.

While our name, MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com, and our website  are dedicated to helping the innocent victims of medical malpractice be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in their local area throughout the United States who may be able and willing to investigate their possible medical malpractice claims for them and represent them in their medical malpractice case, if appropriate, we have always provided the source of our information and the link to our source in our blogs so that our readers can read for themselves the original source information.

MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com will continue to seek out and explore interesting and useful medical malpractice information for our future blogs. If you have information or a request for information regarding medical malpractice issues important to you, please contact us with your information or your request so that we can provide the information to our blog readers.

We wish all of you the best of health, happiness, and enjoyment of life for the New Year!

Please visit our website  or call us toll free (800-295-3959) if we can assist you.

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!

Chicago Health Care Clinic Held Responsible For Medical Malpractice For Baby’s Irreversible Brain Damage

Sunday, November 20th, 2011

A federally-funded health clinic and its doctors in Chicago were held responsible for medical malpractice by a federal judge, and subsequently by an appellate court, for the irreversible brain damage that a baby needlessly suffered as a result of medical negligence.

After the baby was born, he suffered from a common blood infection that should have been promptly diagnosed and was easily treatable with full recovery. But because the doctors at the health clinic failed to diagnose the infection for over 12 hours, the baby suffered permanent brain damage resulting in the baby having spastic quadriplegia and cerebral palsy that are life-long debilitating conditions. If the blood infection had been diagnosed earlier, the use of antibiotics would have easily prevented the irreversible brain damage, the judge and the appellate court found. The signs and symptoms of the infection were evidently clear and profound, including the baby’s inability to see.

After the federal judge awarded substantial compensatory damages based on the baby’s injuries and the parents’ losses, the U.S. government (the Defendant in the medical malpractice lawsuit, pursuant to federal law) appealed the verdict to the appellate court (the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit), arguing that the parents waited too long to file their claim for damages. The parents argued that they were never informed by the clinic or the doctors that their baby’s brain damage was avoidable had the antibiotics been properly and timely administered. It wasn’t until the parents had another child, and that child had a similar infection that was successfully treated with antibiotics, that the parents became suspicious of the care provided to their younger child and the cause of his disabilities.

The appellate court agreed with the parents’ argument and upheld the federal judge’s verdict and judgment in their favor. The money to be paid by the federal government will provide the child, who is now eight years old, with his necessary care expenses for the rest of his life.

Source

One must wonder how different this little boy’s life would have been had the doctors and clinic who were responsible for his care provided the correct medical care at the appropriate time. This boy’s life-long struggles and his parents’ life-long mental anguish are prime examples of why medical malpractice laws must fairly and adequately compensate victims of medical malpractice. Even the most fervent medical malpractice tort reform advocates could not paint this boy’s medical malpractice claim as “frivolous.”

If you or a family member have been injured as a result of the medical malpractice of a trusted medical provider, you may be entitled to compensation for your losses and injuries. Visit our website to be connected with medical malpractice lawyers in your state who may be able to assist you in investigating and bringing a medical malpractice claim. If you prefer, call us toll free at 800-295-3959

Turn to us when you don’t know where to turn.

You can follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as well!